From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: "Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
Hayes Wang <hayeswang@realtek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/5] r8152: add MCU typed read/write functions
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 13:00:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201104110059.whkku3zlck6spnzj@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201104113545.0428f3fe@kernel.org>
On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 11:35:45AM +0100, Marek Behún wrote:
> Or something like this?
>
> #define DEF_R_FUNC(_t, _r, _r_i, _mcu) \
> static inline _t _r(struct r8152 *tp, u16 index) \
> { \
> return _r_i(tp, _mcu, index); \
> }
>
> #define DEF_W_FUNC(_t, _w, _w_i, _mcu) \
> static inline void _w(struct r8152 *tp, u16 index, _t data) \
> { \
> _w_i(tp, _mcu, index, data); \
> }
>
> DEF_R_FUNC(u8, pla_ocp_read_byte, ocp_read_byte, MCU_TYPE_PLA)
> DEF_W_FUNC(u8, pla_ocp_write_byte, ocp_write_byte, MCU_TYPE_PLA)
> DEF_R_FUNC(u16, pla_ocp_read_word, ocp_read_word, MCU_TYPE_PLA)
> DEF_W_FUNC(u16, pla_ocp_write_word, ocp_write_word, MCU_TYPE_PLA)
> DEF_R_FUNC(u32, pla_ocp_read_dword, ocp_read_dword, MCU_TYPE_PLA)
> DEF_W_FUNC(u32, pla_ocp_write_dword, ocp_write_dword, MCU_TYPE_PLA)
>
> DEF_R_FUNC(u8, usb_ocp_read_byte, ocp_read_byte, MCU_TYPE_USB)
> DEF_W_FUNC(u8, usb_ocp_write_byte, ocp_write_byte, MCU_TYPE_USB)
> DEF_R_FUNC(u16, usb_ocp_read_word, ocp_read_word, MCU_TYPE_USB)
> DEF_W_FUNC(u16, usb_ocp_write_word, ocp_write_word, MCU_TYPE_USB)
> DEF_R_FUNC(u32, usb_ocp_read_dword, ocp_read_dword, MCU_TYPE_USB)
> DEF_W_FUNC(u32, usb_ocp_write_dword, ocp_write_dword, MCU_TYPE_USB)
I'm not sure it's worth the change :(
Let's put it another way, your diffstat has 338 insertions and 335
deletions. Aka you're saving 3 lines overall.
With this new approach that doesn't use token concatenation at all,
you're probably not saving anything at all.
Also, I'm not sure that you need to make the functions inline. The
compiler should be smart enough to not generate functions for
usb_ocp_read_byte etc. You can check with
"make drivers/net/usb/r8152.lst".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-04 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-03 19:22 [PATCH net-next 0/5] r8152 changes Marek Behún
2020-11-03 19:22 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] r8152: use generic USB macros to define product table Marek Behún
2020-11-04 1:57 ` Hayes Wang
2020-11-04 6:02 ` Marek Behún
2020-11-04 7:14 ` Hayes Wang
2020-11-04 8:53 ` Greg KH
2020-11-03 19:22 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] r8152: cosmetic improvement of product table macro Marek Behún
2020-11-03 19:22 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] r8152: add MCU typed read/write functions Marek Behún
2020-11-03 21:47 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-11-04 5:55 ` Marek Behún
2020-11-04 8:47 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-11-04 10:25 ` Marek Behún
2020-11-04 10:35 ` Marek Behún
2020-11-04 11:00 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2020-11-04 11:10 ` Marek Behún
2020-11-04 12:14 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-11-04 21:07 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-05 9:54 ` Marek Behún
2020-11-05 10:56 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-11-05 11:30 ` Marek Behún
2020-11-05 12:06 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-11-06 3:01 ` Hayes Wang
2020-11-06 6:39 ` Marek Behún
2020-11-06 7:39 ` Hayes Wang
2020-11-03 19:22 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] r8152: rename r8153_phy_status to r8153_phy_status_wait Marek Behún
2020-11-03 19:22 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] r8152: use *_modify helpers instead of read/write combos Marek Behún
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201104110059.whkku3zlck6spnzj@skbuf \
--to=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=hayeswang@realtek.com \
--cc=kabel@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox