From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E24C4742C for ; Sun, 8 Nov 2020 17:24:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58AB1206DC for ; Sun, 8 Nov 2020 17:24:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="bTybsTGO" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728805AbgKHRX7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Nov 2020 12:23:59 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36690 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727570AbgKHRX7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Nov 2020 12:23:59 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x642.google.com (mail-ej1-x642.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::642]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04320C0613CF; Sun, 8 Nov 2020 09:23:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x642.google.com with SMTP id cw8so8958217ejb.8; Sun, 08 Nov 2020 09:23:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=uD64SD5fYYKuZojXh2+SfJdFKMHHbdamTtqLh7UBTdM=; b=bTybsTGOrgdrX6JpB5DmG3e3+RnRky96XWd+X4BigQRxWvYWKkTTjoPcqSQuj+UoHM gjjcq+Ittpcfkd8K/+hfDCmgG/rX8SkiHWjf5fha+yTjAvCxuVDDeO7mmqyRbkrOUWgY 2YFp2n+Fa8SUGG5MiODs4NT1O39oS2InuSxppdVSgvHWVnJxmQiGxLbl2Ta7gFP4t4js 0myutQT0TT18+Hr17I5iqGw+pUHIkK5emGawkmHau/9oZfEwRuy+4Gl8HBdWPGcGYWKQ xOCcFDPxeGOqwIom23ImzSaUlxfKGJgy3yLxvhMtrFV7nr0K/bEn8/AblTGbWkGuaGzo DBVg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=uD64SD5fYYKuZojXh2+SfJdFKMHHbdamTtqLh7UBTdM=; b=lDtYGkyD7GJNWfXSuiVZ4nfmwQamCWRdm/BNi1uU9aLPA74zkedBgYnkCrLYH054mm WhAwlKGPh5Msf0H9Zsz6qVP1grkKIwkkexI4YZ54NNplWhRXZDDpI3S4K/4v7YIJeUFj LvETtJQIadUrB8TVEDR6mYmSlCprLRgxzAtF8Kp9HtK8wpNpK4AbDUJpbaDZBmlw4SjM pO035ouTd3zfk2EJh2UIMjdFQXTP1VF2hdqah6A4ZoHGayEz+ezuixd1uFbil4uSJT6Q KeXGi4aGM4Wij9dUSj/u7M6CvPfBItjoqqcv7+9V/VH3jVKOKJqiXjK+LJCXQAmCZ/Rm hJWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Qp5p/ehAcvm6K/4CnVZla6iUBWHxGcIrDkgm7C3QCL2/hFkwn uDisyLEOLKpwdqZC3B+jzDc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxYQ4Zfg49EHq19QOmgWVb1oT6QWIOHR8Yb5UnhIhbt4IaUFO05W6XsjDSktsB4II+VG/T3cA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:415a:: with SMTP id l26mr11240222ejk.442.1604856237745; Sun, 08 Nov 2020 09:23:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from skbuf ([188.25.2.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y12sm6448297edv.33.2020.11.08.09.23.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 08 Nov 2020 09:23:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2020 19:23:55 +0200 From: Vladimir Oltean To: DENG Qingfang Cc: Andrew Lunn , Vivien Didelot , Florian Fainelli , Jakub Kicinski , netdev , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tobias Waldekranz , Marek Behun , Russell King - ARM Linux admin Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/3] net: dsa: listen for SWITCHDEV_{FDB,DEL}_ADD_TO_DEVICE on foreign bridge neighbors Message-ID: <20201108172355.5nwsw3ek5qg6z7yx@skbuf> References: <20201108131953.2462644-1-olteanv@gmail.com> <20201108131953.2462644-4-olteanv@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 10:09:25PM +0800, DENG Qingfang wrote: > Can it be turned off for switches that support SA learning from CPU? Is there a good reason I would add another property per switch and not just do it unconditionally?