From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@iogearbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
maze@google.com, lmb@cloudflare.com, shaun@tigera.io,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
marek@cloudflare.com, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
eyal.birger@gmail.com, colrack@gmail.com, brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next V9 7/7] bpf/selftests: tests using bpf_check_mtu BPF-helper
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 11:53:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201218115320.396dbcfc@carbon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160822601093.3481451.9135115478358953965.stgit@firesoul>
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 18:26:50 +0100
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> wrote:
> Adding selftest for BPF-helper bpf_check_mtu(). Making sure
> it can be used from both XDP and TC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c | 204 ++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_check_mtu.c | 196 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 400 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_check_mtu.c
Will send V10 as I have an error in this selftests
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b5d0c3a9abe8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/check_mtu.c
[...]
> +static void test_check_mtu_run_xdp(struct test_check_mtu *skel,
> + struct bpf_program *prog,
> + __u32 mtu_expect)
> +{
> + const char *prog_name = bpf_program__name(prog);
> + int retval_expect = XDP_PASS;
> + __u32 mtu_result = 0;
> + char buf[256];
> + int err;
> +
> + struct bpf_prog_test_run_attr tattr = {
> + .repeat = 1,
> + .data_in = &pkt_v4,
> + .data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4),
> + .data_out = buf,
> + .data_size_out = sizeof(buf),
> + .prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog),
> + };
> +
> + memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf));
> +
> + err = bpf_prog_test_run_xattr(&tattr);
> + CHECK_ATTR(err != 0 || errno != 0, "bpf_prog_test_run",
^^^^^^^^^^^
You/I cannot use the check "errno != 0" here, as something else could
have set it earlier.
> + "prog_name:%s (err %d errno %d retval %d)\n",
> + prog_name, err, errno, tattr.retval);
> +
> + CHECK(tattr.retval != retval_expect, "retval",
> + "progname:%s unexpected retval=%d expected=%d\n",
> + prog_name, tattr.retval, retval_expect);
> +
> + /* Extract MTU that BPF-prog got */
> + mtu_result = skel->bss->global_bpf_mtu_xdp;
> + CHECK(mtu_result != mtu_expect, "MTU-compare-user",
> + "failed (MTU user:%d bpf:%d)", mtu_expect, mtu_result);
> +}
> +static void test_check_mtu_run_tc(struct test_check_mtu *skel,
> + struct bpf_program *prog,
> + __u32 mtu_expect)
> +{
[...]
> + err = bpf_prog_test_run_xattr(&tattr);
> + CHECK_ATTR(err != 0 || errno != 0, "bpf_prog_test_run",
> + "prog_name:%s (err %d errno %d retval %d)\n",
> + prog_name, err, errno, tattr.retval);
Same issue here.
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-18 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-17 17:26 [PATCH bpf-next V9 0/7] bpf: New approach for BPF MTU handling Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-12-17 17:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next V9 1/7] bpf: Remove MTU check in __bpf_skb_max_len Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-12-17 17:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next V9 2/7] bpf: fix bpf_fib_lookup helper MTU check for SKB ctx Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-12-17 17:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next V9 3/7] bpf: bpf_fib_lookup return MTU value as output when looked up Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-12-17 17:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next V9 4/7] bpf: add BPF-helper for MTU checking Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-12-17 17:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next V9 5/7] bpf: drop MTU check when doing TC-BPF redirect to ingress Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-12-17 17:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next V9 6/7] selftests/bpf: use bpf_check_mtu in selftest test_cls_redirect Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-12-17 17:26 ` [PATCH bpf-next V9 7/7] bpf/selftests: tests using bpf_check_mtu BPF-helper Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2020-12-18 10:53 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2020-12-18 20:13 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-12-22 15:30 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201218115320.396dbcfc@carbon \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=borkmann@iogearbox.net \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=colrack@gmail.com \
--cc=eyal.birger@gmail.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lmb@cloudflare.com \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=marek@cloudflare.com \
--cc=maze@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaun@tigera.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).