From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
kuba@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com, alexander.duyck@gmail.com,
maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, saeed@kernel.org,
brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 1/2] net: xdp: introduce xdp_init_buff utility routine
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 09:36:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201221093651.44ff4195@carbon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7f8329b6da1434dc2b05a77f2e800b29628a8913.1608399672.git.lorenzo@kernel.org>
On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 18:55:00 +0100
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org> wrote:
> diff --git a/include/net/xdp.h b/include/net/xdp.h
> index 11ec93f827c0..323340caef88 100644
> --- a/include/net/xdp.h
> +++ b/include/net/xdp.h
> @@ -76,6 +76,13 @@ struct xdp_buff {
> u32 frame_sz; /* frame size to deduce data_hard_end/reserved tailroom*/
> };
>
> +static __always_inline void
> +xdp_init_buff(struct xdp_buff *xdp, u32 frame_sz, struct xdp_rxq_info *rxq)
> +{
> + xdp->frame_sz = frame_sz;
> + xdp->rxq = rxq;
Later you will add 'xdp->mb = 0' here.
> +}
Via the names of your functions, I assume that xdp_init_buff() is
called before xdp_prepare_buff(), right?
(And your pending 'xdp->mb = 0' also prefer this.)
Below in bpf_prog_test_run_xdp() and netif_receive_generic_xdp() you
violate this order... which will give you headaches when implementing
the multi-buff support. It is also a bad example for driver developer
that need to figure out this calling-order from the function names.
Below, will it be possible to have 'init' before 'prepare'?
> +
> /* Reserve memory area at end-of data area.
> *
> * This macro reserves tailroom in the XDP buffer by limiting the
> diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> index c1c30a9f76f3..a8fa5a9e4137 100644
> --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
> +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> @@ -640,10 +640,10 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_xdp(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
> xdp.data = data + headroom;
> xdp.data_meta = xdp.data;
> xdp.data_end = xdp.data + size;
> - xdp.frame_sz = headroom + max_data_sz + tailroom;
>
> rxqueue = __netif_get_rx_queue(current->nsproxy->net_ns->loopback_dev, 0);
> - xdp.rxq = &rxqueue->xdp_rxq;
> + xdp_init_buff(&xdp, headroom + max_data_sz + tailroom,
> + &rxqueue->xdp_rxq);
> bpf_prog_change_xdp(NULL, prog);
> ret = bpf_test_run(prog, &xdp, repeat, &retval, &duration, true);
> if (ret)
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index a46334906c94..b1a765900c01 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -4588,11 +4588,11 @@ static u32 netif_receive_generic_xdp(struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct netdev_rx_queue *rxqueue;
> void *orig_data, *orig_data_end;
> u32 metalen, act = XDP_DROP;
> + u32 mac_len, frame_sz;
> __be16 orig_eth_type;
> struct ethhdr *eth;
> bool orig_bcast;
> int hlen, off;
> - u32 mac_len;
>
> /* Reinjected packets coming from act_mirred or similar should
> * not get XDP generic processing.
> @@ -4631,8 +4631,8 @@ static u32 netif_receive_generic_xdp(struct sk_buff *skb,
> xdp->data_hard_start = skb->data - skb_headroom(skb);
>
> /* SKB "head" area always have tailroom for skb_shared_info */
> - xdp->frame_sz = (void *)skb_end_pointer(skb) - xdp->data_hard_start;
> - xdp->frame_sz += SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
> + frame_sz = (void *)skb_end_pointer(skb) - xdp->data_hard_start;
> + frame_sz += SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
>
> orig_data_end = xdp->data_end;
> orig_data = xdp->data;
> @@ -4641,7 +4641,7 @@ static u32 netif_receive_generic_xdp(struct sk_buff *skb,
> orig_eth_type = eth->h_proto;
>
> rxqueue = netif_get_rxqueue(skb);
> - xdp->rxq = &rxqueue->xdp_rxq;
> + xdp_init_buff(xdp, frame_sz, &rxqueue->xdp_rxq);
>
> act = bpf_prog_run_xdp(xdp_prog, xdp);
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-21 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-19 17:54 [PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/2] introduce xdp_init_buff/xdp_prepare_buff Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-12-19 17:55 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 1/2] net: xdp: introduce xdp_init_buff utility routine Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-12-21 8:36 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2020-12-21 8:58 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-12-19 17:55 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 2/2] net: xdp: introduce xdp_prepare_buff " Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-12-20 8:18 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/2] introduce xdp_init_buff/xdp_prepare_buff Shay Agroskin
2020-12-20 9:45 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201221093651.44ff4195@carbon \
--to=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saeed@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).