From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com>
To: trix@redhat.com
Cc: kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, kafai@fb.com,
songliubraving@fb.com, yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
kpsingh@kernel.org, gustavoars@kernel.org,
louis.peens@netronome.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, oss-drivers@netronome.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfp: remove h from printk format specifier
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 21:21:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201224202152.GA3380@netronome.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201223202053.131157-1-trix@redhat.com>
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 12:20:53PM -0800, trix@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
>
> This change fixes the checkpatch warning described in this commit
> commit cbacb5ab0aa0 ("docs: printk-formats: Stop encouraging use of unnecessary %h[xudi] and %hh[xudi]")
>
> Standard integer promotion is already done and %hx and %hhx is useless
> so do not encourage the use of %hh[xudi] or %h[xudi].
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Hi Tom,
This patch looks appropriate for net-next, which is currently closed.
The changes look fine, but I'm curious to know if its intentionally that
the following was left alone in ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_ethtool.c:nfp_net_get_nspinfo()
snprintf(version, ETHTOOL_FWVERS_LEN, "%hu.%hu"
If the above was not intentional then perhaps you could respin with that
updated and resubmit when net-next re-opens. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-24 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-23 20:20 [PATCH] nfp: remove h from printk format specifier trix
2020-12-24 20:21 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2020-12-24 22:14 ` Tom Rix
2020-12-24 22:39 ` Joe Perches
2020-12-25 14:56 ` Tom Rix
2020-12-25 17:06 ` Joe Perches
2020-12-25 22:13 ` Tom Rix
2020-12-25 23:00 ` Joe Perches
2020-12-26 20:40 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201224202152.GA3380@netronome.com \
--to=simon.horman@netronome.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=louis.peens@netronome.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oss-drivers@netronome.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).