From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com>,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
"Lilijun (Jerry)" <jerry.lilijun@huawei.com>,
chenchanghu <chenchanghu@huawei.com>,
xudingke <xudingke@huawei.com>,
"huangbin (J)" <brian.huangbin@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tun: fix return value when the number of iovs exceeds MAX_SKB_FRAGS
Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2020 06:18:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201227061540-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+FuTSfmKFVZ7_q6nU92YYk-MLKWTa_bkE+L4C8vi5+UQ1_a8A@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 10:56:16AM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 6:51 AM wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
> >
> > Currently the tun_napi_alloc_frags() function returns -ENOMEM when the
> > number of iovs exceeds MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1. However this is inappropriate,
> > we should use -EMSGSIZE instead of -ENOMEM.
> >
> > Fixes: 90e33d459407 ("tun: enable napi_gro_frags() for TUN/TAP driver")
> > Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
>
> Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
>
> It might be good to explain why the distinction matters: one denotes a
> transient failure that the caller (specifically vhost_net) can retry,
> the other a persistent failure due to bad packet geometry that should
> be dropped.
It would be good to have a definition of what constitutes a transient
failure. At the moment there's a proposed patch to vhost that
tests for
err == -EAGAIN || err == -ENOMEM || err == -ENOBUFS
and we'll likely add EIO to that.
Alternatively, I'm inclined to say any invalid input should
just return EINVAL except maybe for memory access errors
which traditionally are EFAULT.
Then vhost can handle any failure except EINVAL and EFAULT
as transient.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-27 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-24 11:48 [PATCH net] tun: fix return value when the number of iovs exceeds MAX_SKB_FRAGS wangyunjian
2020-12-24 15:56 ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-12-27 11:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2020-12-27 9:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201227061540-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=brian.huangbin@huawei.com \
--cc=chenchanghu@huawei.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jerry.lilijun@huawei.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wangyunjian@huawei.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=xudingke@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).