netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc: petrm@nvidia.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de>,
	Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
	Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
	Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
	Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
	Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@mediatek.com>,
	Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Vadym Kochan <vkochan@marvell.com>,
	Taras Chornyi <tchornyi@marvell.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
	Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
	Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 03/11] net: switchdev: remove the transaction structure from port object notifiers
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 16:13:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210107141349.GA1130184@shredder.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210107111822.icmzu4lvs5ygsuef@skbuf>

On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 01:18:22PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 12:38:35PM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > +Petr
> > 
> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 01:17:20AM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > >  static int mlxsw_sp_port_obj_add(struct net_device *dev,
> > >  				 const struct switchdev_obj *obj,
> > > -				 struct switchdev_trans *trans,
> > >  				 struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct mlxsw_sp_port *mlxsw_sp_port = netdev_priv(dev);
> > >  	const struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan *vlan;
> > > +	struct switchdev_trans trans;
> > >  	int err = 0;
> > >  
> > >  	switch (obj->id) {
> > >  	case SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_VLAN:
> > >  		vlan = SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_VLAN(obj);
> > > -		err = mlxsw_sp_port_vlans_add(mlxsw_sp_port, vlan, trans,
> > > +
> > 
> > Got the regression results. The call to mlxsw_sp_span_respin() should be
> > placed here because it needs to be triggered regardless of the return
> > value of mlxsw_sp_port_vlans_add().
> 
> So before, mlxsw_sp_span_respin() was called right in between the
> prepare phase and the commit phase, regardless of the error value of
> mlxsw_sp_port_vlans_add. How does that work, I assume that
> mlxsw_sp_span_respin_work gets to run after the commit phase because it
> serializes using rtnl_lock()? Then why did it matter enough to schedule
> it between the prepare and commit phase in the first place?
> And what is there to do in mlxsw_sp_span_respin_work when
> mlxsw_sp_port_vlans_add returns -EOPNOTSUPP, -EBUSY, -EINVAL, -EEXIST or
> -ENOMEM?

The bridge driver will ignore -EOPNOTSUPP and actually add the VLAN on
the bridge device. See commit 9c86ce2c1ae3 ("net: bridge: Notify about
bridge VLANs") and commit ea4721751977 ("mlxsw: spectrum_switchdev:
Ignore bridge VLAN events")

Since the VLAN was successfully added on the bridge device,
mlxsw_sp_span_respin_work() should be able to resolve the egress port
for a packet that is mirrored to a gre tap and passes through the bridge
device.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-07 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-06 23:17 [PATCH v3 net-next 00/11] Get rid of the switchdev transactional model Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-06 23:17 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 01/11] net: switchdev: remove vid_begin -> vid_end range from VLAN objects Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-07  7:17   ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2021-01-07 10:10     ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-06 23:17 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 02/11] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: deny vid 0 on the CPU port and DSA links too Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-06 23:17 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 03/11] net: switchdev: remove the transaction structure from port object notifiers Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-07 10:38   ` Ido Schimmel
2021-01-07 10:40     ` Ido Schimmel
2021-01-07 11:04       ` Ido Schimmel
2021-01-07 11:17     ` Petr Machata
2021-01-07 11:18     ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-07 14:13       ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2021-01-06 23:17 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 04/11] net: switchdev: delete switchdev_port_obj_add_now Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-06 23:17 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 05/11] net: switchdev: remove the transaction structure from port attributes Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-06 23:17 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 06/11] net: dsa: remove the transactional logic from ageing time notifiers Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-06 23:17 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 07/11] net: dsa: remove the transactional logic from MDB entries Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-06 23:17 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 08/11] net: dsa: remove the transactional logic from VLAN objects Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-06 23:17 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 09/11] net: dsa: remove obsolete comments about switchdev transactions Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-06 23:17 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 10/11] mlxsw: spectrum_switchdev: remove transactional logic for VLAN objects Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-06 23:17 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 11/11] net: switchdev: delete the transaction object Vladimir Oltean

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210107141349.GA1130184@shredder.lan \
    --to=idosch@idosch.org \
    --cc=Landen.Chao@mediatek.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
    --cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=ioana.ciornei@nxp.com \
    --cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
    --cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kurt@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=tchornyi@marvell.com \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    --cc=vkochan@marvell.com \
    --cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).