netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: lll <liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, fw@strlen.de,
	soheil@google.com, ncardwell@google.com, ycheng@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: remove obsolete paramter sysctl_tcp_low_latency
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 18:45:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210107174538.GA19605@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210107090635.440b1fc6@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>

Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Got it. But a question: why tcp_tw_recycle can be removed totally?
> > it is also part of uAPI
> 
> Good question, perhaps with tcp_tw_recycle we wanted to make sure users
> who depended on it notice removal, since the feature was broken by
> design? 
> 
> tcp_low_latency is an optimization, not functionality which users may
> depend on.
> 
> But I may be wrong so CCing authors.

I guess it was just a case of 'noone noticed'.
I'm not sure if anyone would notice dropping lowlatency sysctl, was just
a case of 'overly careful'.  Personally I'd rather have them gone so
'sysctl tcp.bla' shows if the feature exists/does something.

      reply	other threads:[~2021-01-07 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-18  6:11 [PATCH] tcp: remove obsolete paramter sysctl_tcp_low_latency lyl
2020-12-19  0:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-07  3:08   ` lll
2021-01-07 17:06     ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-07 17:45       ` Florian Westphal [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210107174538.GA19605@breakpoint.cc \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=liyonglong@chinatelecom.cn \
    --cc=ncardwell@google.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=soheil@google.com \
    --cc=ycheng@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).