From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ethtool: allow MAC drivers to override ethtool get_ts_info
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 17:27:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210114172729.GQ1605@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210114170942.GW1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 05:09:42PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 05:35:25PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 11:13:44AM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > > Check whether the MAC driver has implemented the get_ts_info()
> > > method first, and call it if present. If this method returns
> > > -EOPNOTSUPP, defer to the phylib or default implementation.
> > >
> > > This allows network drivers such as mvpp2 to use their more accurate
> > > timestamping implementation than using a less accurate implementation
> > > in the PHY. Network drivers can opt to defer to phylib by returning
> > > -EOPNOTSUPP.
> > >
> > > This change will be needed if the Marvell PHY drivers add support for
> > > PTP.
> > >
> > > Note: this may cause a change for any drivers that use phylib and
> > > provide get_ts_info(). It is not obvious if any such cases exist.
> >
> > Hi Russell
> >
> > We can detect that condition through? Call both, then do a WARN() if
> > we are changing the order? Maybe we should do that for a couple of
> > cycles?
>
> I guess we could do something, but IMHO this really does not justify
> using heavy hammers like WARN(). It's pointless producing a backtrace.
> If we want a large noisy multi-line message that stands out, we should
> just do that.
>
> I think we can detect with something like:
>
> if (ops->get_ts_info && phy_has_tsinfo(phydev)) {
> netdev_warn(dev, "Both the PHY and the MAC support PTP. Which you end up with may change.\n");
> }
>
> That said, this is _actually_ a fix.
>
> As the code stands today:
>
> __ethtool_get_ts_info() checks phy_has_tsinfo() and uses phy_ts_info()
> in preference to ops->get_ts_info(), giving the PHY code first dibs on
> intercepting this call.
>
> Meanwhile, the ioctl() code gives the network driver first dibs on
> intercepting the SIOCSHWTSTAMP and SIOCGHWTSTAMP ioctls.
>
> This means that if you have both a PHY supporting timestamping, and a
> MAC driver, you end up with the ethtool get_ts_info() call giving a
> response from the PHY implementation but SIOCSHWTSTAMP and
> SIOCGHWTSTAMP being intercepted by the MAC implementation.
>
> This is exactly what will happen today to mvpp2 if we merge my patches
> adding PTP support to the Marvell 88e151x PHYs without this patch.
>
> So, my patch merely brings consistency to this.
>
> > For netlink ethtool, we can also provide an additional attribute. A
> > MAC, or PHY indicator we can do in the core. A string for the name of
> > the driver would need a bigger change.
>
> Unfortunately, PTP is not solely controlled through ethtool - it's
> also controlled via ioctl() where it's not so easy to direct the
> calls to either the MAC or PHY.
BTW, none of this is new informationm we're just re-covering the same
points that were already discussed back in July 2020:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20200729105807.GZ1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk/
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-14 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-10 11:13 [PATCH net-next] net: ethtool: allow MAC drivers to override ethtool get_ts_info Russell King
2021-01-10 16:35 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-01-14 3:05 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-14 17:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-14 17:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2021-01-14 12:55 ` Richard Cochran
2021-01-14 13:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-14 13:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-14 17:27 ` Richard Cochran
2021-01-14 17:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-14 22:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-21 4:04 ` Richard Cochran
2021-01-21 10:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-21 15:06 ` Richard Cochran
2021-01-21 16:22 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-01-21 17:03 ` Richard Cochran
2021-01-21 18:55 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-01-21 22:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-01-21 18:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210114172729.GQ1605@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).