netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 4/4] net: inline rollback_registered_many()
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 12:25:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210119202521.3108236-5-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210119202521.3108236-1-kuba@kernel.org>

Similar to the change for rollback_registered() -
rollback_registered_many() was a part of unregister_netdevice_many()
minus the net_set_todo(), which is no longer needed.

Functionally this patch moves the list_empty() check back after:

	BUG_ON(dev_boot_phase);
	ASSERT_RTNL();

but I can't find any reason why that would be an issue.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
 net/core/dev.c | 22 ++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index a7841d03c910..dee6488f8a31 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -5709,7 +5709,7 @@ static void flush_all_backlogs(void)
 	}
 
 	/* we can have in flight packet[s] on the cpus we are not flushing,
-	 * synchronize_net() in rollback_registered_many() will take care of
+	 * synchronize_net() in unregister_netdevice_many() will take care of
 	 * them
 	 */
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, &flush_cpus)
@@ -10605,8 +10605,6 @@ void synchronize_net(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(synchronize_net);
 
-static void rollback_registered_many(struct list_head *head);
-
 /**
  *	unregister_netdevice_queue - remove device from the kernel
  *	@dev: device
@@ -10630,8 +10628,7 @@ void unregister_netdevice_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head)
 		LIST_HEAD(single);
 
 		list_add(&dev->unreg_list, &single);
-		rollback_registered_many(&single);
-		list_del(&single);
+		unregister_netdevice_many(&single);
 	}
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_netdevice_queue);
@@ -10644,15 +10641,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_netdevice_queue);
  *  we force a list_del() to make sure stack wont be corrupted later.
  */
 void unregister_netdevice_many(struct list_head *head)
-{
-	if (!list_empty(head)) {
-		rollback_registered_many(head);
-		list_del(head);
-	}
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_netdevice_many);
-
-static void rollback_registered_many(struct list_head *head)
 {
 	struct net_device *dev, *tmp;
 	LIST_HEAD(close_head);
@@ -10660,6 +10648,9 @@ static void rollback_registered_many(struct list_head *head)
 	BUG_ON(dev_boot_phase);
 	ASSERT_RTNL();
 
+	if (list_empty(head))
+		return;
+
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, tmp, head, unreg_list) {
 		/* Some devices call without registering
 		 * for initialization unwind. Remove those
@@ -10743,7 +10734,10 @@ static void rollback_registered_many(struct list_head *head)
 		dev_put(dev);
 		net_set_todo(dev);
 	}
+
+	list_del(head);
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_netdevice_many);
 
 /**
  *	unregister_netdev - remove device from the kernel
-- 
2.26.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-19 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-19 20:25 [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: inline rollback_registered() functions Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-19 20:25 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net: move net_set_todo inside rollback_registered() Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-19 20:25 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/4] net: inline rollback_registered() Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-19 20:25 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] net: move rollback_registered_many() Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-19 20:25 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2021-01-19 23:18 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] net: inline rollback_registered() functions Edwin Peer
2021-01-21  5:05   ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-21  5:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210119202521.3108236-5-kuba@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).