From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E22C433DB for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 01:31:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C8964DC4 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 01:31:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231274AbhA1BbQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:31:16 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45648 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231171AbhA1BbM (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 20:31:12 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com (mail-ej1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D477C061573 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 17:30:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id hs11so5439166ejc.1 for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 17:30:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=O93nDuwi0sHDq1zfGslQOfVW2mgps/9mxxTp8mPOWRQ=; b=OGZZgcnPSxpgRFMMzQAnTSFYEZtYDu8DIQIx8kPGBdeNCZ2rYF4qe0HKKbLIfNseGU qLoOYCJ1EuKBQVpMi9QBaPZ1Jc8c/Dl4F2LaZ+FhF+95VcxN/Iu7lxg2TJT8Mlnvhpr9 YwV38WribWcSt7PIXbuH77KdZ4k3lTiTw+Or3a53Q8KXGYhNnHVN27Y7B6zByoykBCUz ezghT6RtiUVIN+o9tH3EYU+PVTj5DcepL4Lt/eBy+KJDdVcYbNYEVnnZiqK8zsZ+Fa0Z 4Syjl7c9hWch4zW2UaTpLhowhlMKpxn8gyyF5TRLM129WX54FXGSl3dGFHwE7S67Y9xA c66A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=O93nDuwi0sHDq1zfGslQOfVW2mgps/9mxxTp8mPOWRQ=; b=f24Dh8NAPl03QuYrIN5A7VTeU/pouojaQ59k6l/Mya3Du585VwyqjBLwjZi2jQGMJ7 VbXdSJpvnPg/QP/eRr1nMiQZGKNEfvx5+h41fYczZ0eCVjwEI4YPmA9MZtZQnt2HLgDo oaGtHRmWG8yTfGkerwnIOx5eqnCFo8UMkE7tATNo6DInF28276CFW9kN8rPNkO8LtWLY nqYIiYvTbPdOid2Y+cD0R03KIqxdPYhZFFo96ugXH9Q3t4No766hehx9XbC+Dtzhb/e0 tPmM3/0IRv8OYLfKKa8wty9+hSJP3VYx8u7HF66qek0Mytlgq4SefRhk11r3Ix1gXWp6 yFkg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5335ApFQnZUdclpbYlXFCnJ0fwgZRum7I+4paI+sM1CMWKNv58EB ac1lIE/rj9G8Uf9ET5QQ+xM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwC3ze1e4Ho4oFleK2uQZbfIlsBcq2qGXtQroYDUEOYEU1QbuM0YIJsuwDxHViAb5/8z6GFEQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a851:: with SMTP id dx17mr8453955ejb.537.1611797430035; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 17:30:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from skbuf (5-12-227-87.residential.rdsnet.ro. [5.12.227.87]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m20sm2386251edj.43.2021.01.27.17.30.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 17:30:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 03:30:28 +0200 From: Vladimir Oltean To: Florian Fainelli Cc: "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , Vivien Didelot , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] Automatically manage DSA master interface state Message-ID: <20210128013028.kr6jx4xjcm3irllo@skbuf> References: <20210127010028.1619443-1-olteanv@gmail.com> <99d4c608-d821-7f87-48c1-aa1898441194@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <99d4c608-d821-7f87-48c1-aa1898441194@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 05:03:23PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > I really like all patches but number #2, though I don't believe there > are existing use cases besides you one you described where it makes > sense to keep a switch in an unmanaged mode being "headless" with its > CPU port down, while the user-facing ports are up. So what should I do with #2? Every other stacked interface goes down when its lowers go down, if that brings any consolation.