public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
To: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"jhs@mojatatu.com" <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	"xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	"jiri@resnulli.us" <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com" <Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com>,
	Po Liu <po.liu@nxp.com>,
	"intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
	<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
	"anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com" <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	"mkubecek@suse.cz" <mkubecek@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/8] taprio: Add support for frame preemption offload
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 23:20:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210129232015.atl4336zqy4ev3bi@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wnvvsayz.fsf@vcostago-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 01:13:24PM -0800, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
> > Secondly, why should at least one queue be preemptible? What's wrong
> > with frame preemption being triggered by a tc-taprio window smaller than
> > the packet size? This can happen regardless of traffic class.
>
> It's the opposite, at least one queue needs to be marked
> express/non-preemptible.

I meant to ask why should at least one queue be express. The second part
of the question remains valid.

> But as I said above, perhaps this should be handled in a per-driver
> way. I will remove this from taprio.
>
> I think removing this check/limitation from taprio should solve the
> second part of your question, right?

Nope. Can you point me to either 802.1Q or 802.3 saying that at least
one priority should go to the express MAC?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-29 23:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-22 22:44 [PATCH net-next v3 0/8] ethtool: Add support for frame preemption Vinicius Costa Gomes
2021-01-22 22:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/8] ethtool: Add support for configuring " Vinicius Costa Gomes
2021-03-02 14:23   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-03  0:40     ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2021-03-03  0:51       ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-05 22:38         ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2021-01-22 22:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/8] taprio: Add support for frame preemption offload Vinicius Costa Gomes
2021-01-26  0:09   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-29 21:13     ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2021-01-29 21:57       ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-29 23:12         ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2021-01-30  0:27           ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-29 23:20       ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2021-01-29 23:42         ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2021-01-30  0:25           ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-22 22:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/8] igc: Set the RX packet buffer size for TSN mode Vinicius Costa Gomes
2021-01-22 22:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/8] igc: Only dump registers if configured to dump HW information Vinicius Costa Gomes
2021-01-22 22:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/8] igc: Avoid TX Hangs because long cycles Vinicius Costa Gomes
2021-01-26  0:02   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-27  9:03     ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2021-01-29 21:01     ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2021-01-22 22:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 6/8] igc: Add support for tuning frame preemption via ethtool Vinicius Costa Gomes
2021-01-26  0:32   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-29 21:27     ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2021-01-29 23:16       ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-03-03  1:07   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-22 22:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 7/8] igc: Add support for Frame Preemption offload Vinicius Costa Gomes
2021-01-22 22:44 ` [PATCH net-next v3 8/8] igc: Separate TSN configurations that can be updated Vinicius Costa Gomes
2021-01-29 23:37 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/8] ethtool: Add support for frame preemption Vladimir Oltean
2021-01-30  0:11   ` Vinicius Costa Gomes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210129232015.atl4336zqy4ev3bi@skbuf \
    --to=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --cc=Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=po.liu@nxp.com \
    --cc=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox