From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F1DC433DB for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 20:08:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F335964DDC for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 20:08:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240478AbhBBUIx (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2021 15:08:53 -0500 Received: from esa.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.154.123]:41367 "EHLO esa.microchip.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240471AbhBBUIG (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2021 15:08:06 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=microchip.com; i=@microchip.com; q=dns/txt; s=mchp; t=1612296485; x=1643832485; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=RKeIouPfYkF0dzBJ5Fr1sj32s0c2UpAxGehgP0ipTIk=; b=uJ99v+zInCceXDFxcWbQb53kxFD3o7OUp1wBaEoRo4An+CpVgE0G1iGc MrD01HMfmbRuizuzlZTCMYEq2LAek5MbivyKWHYtXKPdI/INoIIiOHtDg bEPqSA0ZTLoPb0WqBBmpNef9dvonUIiURHoEWPR/Wvbo/aCWBbTy23ZZ8 p4Y5LB+6n/UwUFYeMV/6rv7CQzFF5Ioj3H605813QJ9uslmkuwY8YJpA1 MMqV0UBHoqSwHC/kMjFpX1sXGcAm85r7sdBPc/tmU1eS/lmRPnl/7X2ET hisqglL8ZsJHwAAiQL+3WVTAs04JbyC5Zg3OIx7XWpYVelTz0WwslGKca g==; IronPort-SDR: 2xhiryMspxkpjTx8/URWFWFtt5AZqaoYtryTyoFruivUi+L6BjodWopkvomUtuzFv0TRs7RFLJ QCtdHBGyisQAQwHMJiKa4eZ9F2993pp8dvvqpQwH1WeGHCflqUfh8K9g15UFxbMl5tH2r87rBe ICS9IG3ZfSQsw3qIRPgwacdAuxk1ks5sunoGYO2waIcA5km5vo/VjojVsFKDJswHK4iSy91mc2 Unq7G1oi5SU6sM1n/9Pa9qYk/hWSAYFb598US+0JC9hnbv9lZF/d3utjCizc4eXDgIaTbTQs9r glQ= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.79,396,1602572400"; d="scan'208";a="42661970" Received: from smtpout.microchip.com (HELO email.microchip.com) ([198.175.253.82]) by esa6.microchip.iphmx.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA256; 02 Feb 2021 13:06:50 -0700 Received: from chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) by chn-vm-ex04.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 13:06:50 -0700 Received: from localhost (10.10.115.15) by chn-vm-ex03.mchp-main.com (10.10.85.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 13:06:49 -0700 Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 21:06:49 +0100 From: Horatiu Vultur To: Jakub Kicinski CC: Rasmus Villemoes , , Vladimir Oltean , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/4] bridge: mrp: Extend br_mrp_switchdev_* Message-ID: <20210202200649.mc7vpgltoqxf2oni@soft-dev3.localdomain> References: <20210127205241.2864728-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> <20210129190114.3f5b6b44@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <9143d15f-c41d-f0ab-7be0-32d797820384@prevas.dk> <20210202115032.6affffdc@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210202115032.6affffdc@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org The 02/02/2021 11:50, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 08:40:02 +0100 Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > > On 30/01/2021 04.01, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 21:52:37 +0100 Horatiu Vultur wrote: > > >> This patch series extends MRP switchdev to allow the SW to have a better > > >> understanding if the HW can implement the MRP functionality or it needs > > >> to help the HW to run it. There are 3 cases: > > > > >> v2: > > >> - fix typos in comments and in commit messages > > >> - remove some of the comments > > >> - move repeated code in helper function > > >> - fix issue when deleting a node when sw_backup was true > > > > > > Folks who were involved in previous MRP conversations - does this look > > > good to you? Anyone planning to test? > > > > I am planning to test these, but it's unlikely I'll get around to it > > this week unfortunately. > > Horatiu are you okay with deferring the series until Rasmus validates? > Given none of this HW is upstream now (AFAIU) this is an awkward set > to handle. Having a confirmation from Rasmus would make us a little bit > more comfortable. It is perfectly fine for me to wait for Rasmus to validate this series. Also I have started to have a look how to implement the switchdev calls for Ocelot driver. I might have something by the end of the week, but lets see. -- /Horatiu