Re: [PATCH net-next v4] net: psample: Introduce stubs to remove NIC driver dependency

[Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>]

On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 10:57:46AM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 09:03:50AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 08:08:37PM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 09:37:11AM +0800, Chris Mi wrote:
> > > > Hi Ido,
> > > >
> > > > On 1/30/2021 10:42 PM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 12:30:09PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 14:08:39 +0800 Chris Mi wrote:
> > > > > > > Instead of discussing it several days, maybe it's better to review
> > > > > > > current patch, so that we can move forward :)
> > > > > > It took you 4 revisions to post a patch which builds cleanly and now
> > > > > > you want to hasten the review? My favorite kind of submission.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The mlxsw core + spectrum drivers are 65 times the size of psample
> > > > > > on my system. Why is the dependency a problem?
> > > > > mlxsw has been using psample for ~4 years and I don't remember seeing a
> > > > > single complaint about the dependency. I don't understand why this patch
> > > > > is needed.
> > > > Please see Saeed's comment in previous email:
> > > >
> > > > "
> > > >
> > > > The issue is with distros who ship modules independently.. having a
> > > > hard dependency will make it impossible for basic mlx5_core.ko users to
> > > > load the driver when psample is not installed/loaded.
> > > >
> > > > I prefer to have 0 dependency on external modules in a HW driver.
> > > > "
> > >
> > > I saw it, but it basically comes down to personal preferences.
> >
> > It is more than personal preferences. In opposite to the mlxsw which is
> > used for netdev only, the mlx5_core is used by other subsystems, e.g. RDMA,
> > so Saeed's request to avoid extra dependencies makes sense.
> >
> > We don't need psample dependency to run RDMA traffic.
>
> Right, you don't need it. The dependency is "PSAMPLE || PSAMPLE=n". You
> can compile out psample and RDMA will work.

So do you suggest to all our HPC users recompile their distribution kernel
just to make sure that psample is not called?

>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > We are working on a tc sample offload feature for mlx5_core. The distros
> > > > are likely to request us to do this. So we address it before submitting
> > > > the driver changes.
> > >
> > > Which distros? Can they comment here? mlxsw is in RHEL and I don't
> > > remember queries from them about the psample module.
> >
> > There is a huge difference between being in RHEL and actively work with
> > partners as mlx5 does.
> >
> > The open mailing list is not the right place to discuss our partnership
> > relations.
>
> I did not ask about "partnership relations". I asked for someone more
> familiar with the problem that can explain the distro issue. But if such
> a basic question can't be asked, then the distro argument should not
> have been made in the first place.

It is not what you wrote, but if you don't want to take distro argument
into account, please don't bring mlxsw either.

Thanks