Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Cc: "jiri@resnulli.us" <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	"ivecera@redhat.com" <ivecera@redhat.com>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"roopa@nvidia.com" <roopa@nvidia.com>,
	"nikolay@nvidia.com" <nikolay@nvidia.com>,
	"rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk" <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>,
	"andrew@lunn.ch" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
	"alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	"UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org" 
	<bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 5/5] net: mscc: ocelot: Add support for MRP
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:18:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210210101802.6ztf6c3ifldfa5fw@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210209202112.2545325-6-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>

Would you mind adding the switchdev MRP support for the DSA driver too,
and move the code to the common ocelot library? I would like to give it
a run. I think that's only fair, since I have to keep in sync the
vsc7514 driver too for features that get added through DSA :)

On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 09:21:12PM +0100, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> Add basic support for MRP. The HW will just trap all MRP frames on the
> ring ports to CPU and allow the SW to process them. In this way it is
> possible to for this node to behave both as MRM and MRC.
> 
> Current limitations are:
> - it doesn't support Interconnect roles.
> - it supports only a single ring.
> - the HW should be able to do forwarding of MRP Test frames so the SW
>   will not need to do this. So it would be able to have the role MRC
>   without SW support.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c     | 154 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c |   6 +
>  include/soc/mscc/ocelot.h                  |   6 +
>  3 files changed, 166 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
> index 8f12fa45b1b5..65971403e823 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_net.c
> @@ -9,7 +9,10 @@
>   */
>  
>  #include <linux/if_bridge.h>
> +#include <linux/mrp_bridge.h>
>  #include <net/pkt_cls.h>
> +#include <soc/mscc/ocelot_vcap.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/mrp_bridge.h>
>  #include "ocelot.h"
>  #include "ocelot_vcap.h"
>  
> @@ -1069,6 +1072,139 @@ static int ocelot_port_obj_del_mdb(struct net_device *dev,
>  	return ocelot_port_mdb_del(ocelot, port, mdb);
>  }
>  
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_MRP)
> +static int ocelot_mrp_del_vcap(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port)
> +{
> +	struct ocelot_vcap_block *block_vcap_is2;
> +	struct ocelot_vcap_filter *filter;
> +
> +	block_vcap_is2 = &ocelot->block[VCAP_IS2];
> +	filter = ocelot_vcap_block_find_filter_by_id(block_vcap_is2, port,
> +						     false);
> +	if (!filter)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return ocelot_vcap_filter_del(ocelot, filter);
> +}
> +
> +static int ocelot_add_mrp(struct net_device *dev,
> +			  const struct switchdev_obj_mrp *mrp)
> +{
> +	struct ocelot_port_private *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> +	struct ocelot_port *ocelot_port = &priv->port;
> +	struct ocelot *ocelot = ocelot_port->ocelot;
> +
> +	if (mrp->p_port != dev && mrp->s_port != dev)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (ocelot->mrp_ring_id != 0 &&
> +	    ocelot->mrp_s_port &&
> +	    ocelot->mrp_p_port)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (mrp->p_port == dev)
> +		ocelot->mrp_p_port = dev;
> +
> +	if (mrp->s_port == dev)
> +		ocelot->mrp_s_port = dev;
> +
> +	ocelot->mrp_ring_id = mrp->ring_id;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ocelot_del_mrp(struct net_device *dev,
> +			  const struct switchdev_obj_mrp *mrp)
> +{
> +	struct ocelot_port_private *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> +	struct ocelot_port *ocelot_port = &priv->port;
> +	struct ocelot *ocelot = ocelot_port->ocelot;
> +
> +	if (ocelot->mrp_p_port != dev && ocelot->mrp_s_port != dev)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (ocelot->mrp_ring_id == 0 &&
> +	    !ocelot->mrp_s_port &&
> +	    !ocelot->mrp_p_port)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (ocelot_mrp_del_vcap(ocelot, priv->chip_port))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (ocelot->mrp_p_port == dev)
> +		ocelot->mrp_p_port = NULL;
> +
> +	if (ocelot->mrp_s_port == dev)
> +		ocelot->mrp_s_port = NULL;
> +
> +	ocelot->mrp_ring_id = 0;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ocelot_add_ring_role(struct net_device *dev,
> +				const struct switchdev_obj_ring_role_mrp *mrp)
> +{
> +	struct ocelot_port_private *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> +	struct ocelot_port *ocelot_port = &priv->port;
> +	struct ocelot *ocelot = ocelot_port->ocelot;
> +	struct ocelot_vcap_filter *filter;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	if (ocelot->mrp_ring_id != mrp->ring_id)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (!mrp->sw_backup)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	if (ocelot->mrp_p_port != dev && ocelot->mrp_s_port != dev)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	filter = kzalloc(sizeof(*filter), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!filter)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	filter->key_type = OCELOT_VCAP_KEY_ETYPE;
> +	filter->prio = 1;
> +	filter->id.cookie = priv->chip_port;
> +	filter->id.tc_offload = false;
> +	filter->block_id = VCAP_IS2;
> +	filter->type = OCELOT_VCAP_FILTER_OFFLOAD;
> +	filter->ingress_port_mask = BIT(priv->chip_port);
> +	*(__be16 *)filter->key.etype.etype.value = htons(ETH_P_MRP);
> +	*(__be16 *)filter->key.etype.etype.mask = htons(0xffff);
> +	filter->action.mask_mode = OCELOT_MASK_MODE_PERMIT_DENY;
> +	filter->action.port_mask = 0x0;
> +	filter->action.cpu_copy_ena = true;
> +	filter->action.cpu_qu_num = 0;
> +
> +	err = ocelot_vcap_filter_add(ocelot, filter, NULL);
> +	if (err)
> +		kfree(filter);
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int ocelot_del_ring_role(struct net_device *dev,
> +				const struct switchdev_obj_ring_role_mrp *mrp)
> +{
> +	struct ocelot_port_private *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> +	struct ocelot_port *ocelot_port = &priv->port;
> +	struct ocelot *ocelot = ocelot_port->ocelot;
> +
> +	if (ocelot->mrp_ring_id != mrp->ring_id)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (!mrp->sw_backup)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> +	if (ocelot->mrp_p_port != dev && ocelot->mrp_s_port != dev)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return ocelot_mrp_del_vcap(ocelot, priv->chip_port);
> +}
> +#endif
> +

Would it make sense for this chunk of conditionally compiled code to
stay in a separate file like ocelot_mrp.c?

>  static int ocelot_port_obj_add(struct net_device *dev,
>  			       const struct switchdev_obj *obj,
>  			       struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> @@ -1083,6 +1219,15 @@ static int ocelot_port_obj_add(struct net_device *dev,
>  	case SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_MDB:
>  		ret = ocelot_port_obj_add_mdb(dev, SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_MDB(obj));
>  		break;
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_MRP)
> +	case SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_MRP:
> +		ret = ocelot_add_mrp(dev, SWITCHDEV_OBJ_MRP(obj));
> +		break;
> +	case SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_RING_ROLE_MRP:
> +		ret = ocelot_add_ring_role(dev,
> +					   SWITCHDEV_OBJ_RING_ROLE_MRP(obj));
> +		break;
> +#endif

I'm not really sure why SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_MRP is conditionally defined.
If you look at SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING, that isn't
conditionally defined, even though it depends on CONFIG_BRIDGE_VLAN_FILTERING
at runtime.

>  	default:
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  	}
> @@ -1103,6 +1248,15 @@ static int ocelot_port_obj_del(struct net_device *dev,
>  	case SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_PORT_MDB:
>  		ret = ocelot_port_obj_del_mdb(dev, SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_MDB(obj));
>  		break;
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_MRP)
> +	case SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_MRP:
> +		ret = ocelot_del_mrp(dev, SWITCHDEV_OBJ_MRP(obj));
> +		break;
> +	case SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_RING_ROLE_MRP:
> +		ret = ocelot_del_ring_role(dev,
> +					   SWITCHDEV_OBJ_RING_ROLE_MRP(obj));
> +		break;
> +#endif
>  	default:
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c
> index 6b6eb92149ba..96a9c9f98060 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c
> @@ -698,6 +698,12 @@ static irqreturn_t ocelot_xtr_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
>  			skb->offload_fwd_mark = 1;
>  
>  		skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, dev);
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_MRP)
> +		if (skb->protocol == ntohs(ETH_P_MRP) &&
> +		    (priv->dev == ocelot->mrp_p_port ||
> +		     priv->dev == ocelot->mrp_s_port))
> +			skb->offload_fwd_mark = 0;
> +#endif

I wonder if you could just reserve a certain CPUQ for trapped traffic,
and just generically check for that, instead of MRP port roles?

>  		if (!skb_defer_rx_timestamp(skb))
>  			netif_rx(skb);
>  		dev->stats.rx_bytes += len;
> diff --git a/include/soc/mscc/ocelot.h b/include/soc/mscc/ocelot.h
> index d0d48e9620fb..d95c019ad84e 100644
> --- a/include/soc/mscc/ocelot.h
> +++ b/include/soc/mscc/ocelot.h
> @@ -682,6 +682,12 @@ struct ocelot {
>  	/* Protects the PTP clock */
>  	spinlock_t			ptp_clock_lock;
>  	struct ptp_pin_desc		ptp_pins[OCELOT_PTP_PINS_NUM];
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_MRP)
> +	u16				mrp_ring_id;
> +	struct net_device		*mrp_p_port;
> +	struct net_device		*mrp_s_port;
> +#endif
>  };
>  
>  struct ocelot_policer {
> -- 
> 2.27.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-10 10:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-09 20:21 [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] bridge: mrp: Extend br_mrp_switchdev_* Horatiu Vultur
2021-02-09 20:21 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/5] switchdev: mrp: Extend ring_role_mrp and in_role_mrp Horatiu Vultur
2021-02-09 20:21 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/5] bridge: mrp: Add 'enum br_mrp_hw_support' Horatiu Vultur
2021-02-09 20:21 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/5] bridge: mrp: Extend br_mrp_switchdev to detect better the errors Horatiu Vultur
2021-02-09 20:21 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/5] bridge: mrp: Update br_mrp to use new return values of br_mrp_switchdev Horatiu Vultur
2021-02-09 20:21 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/5] net: mscc: ocelot: Add support for MRP Horatiu Vultur
2021-02-10 10:18   ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2021-02-10 12:30     ` Horatiu Vultur
2021-02-10 10:08 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/5] bridge: mrp: Extend br_mrp_switchdev_* Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-10 12:15   ` Horatiu Vultur

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210210101802.6ztf6c3ifldfa5fw@skbuf \
    --to=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
    --cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nikolay@nvidia.com \
    --cc=rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk \
    --cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox