From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: phy: at803x: use proper locking in at803x_aneg_done()
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 23:32:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210215213206.qhjiyk4ahg75v6d2@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <758cac1a76541e0e419a54af14d0cd20@walle.cc>
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 09:48:53PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
> Am 2021-02-14 03:24, schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
> > On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 03:18:49AM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
> > > Am 14. Februar 2021 02:57:33 MEZ schrieb Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>:
> > > >Hi Michael,
> > > >
> > > >On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 02:04:05AM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
> > > >> at803x_aneg_done() checks if auto-negotiation is completed on the SGMII
> > > >> side. This doesn't take the mdio bus lock and the page switching is
> > > >> open-coded. Now that we have proper page support, just use
> > > >> phy_read_paged(). Also use phydev->interface to check if we have an
> > > >> SGMII link instead of reading the mode register and be a bit more
> > > >> precise on the warning message.
> > > >>
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
> > > >> ---
> > > >
> > > >How did you test this patch?
> > >
> > > I'm afraid it's just compile time tested.
> >
> > I'm asking because at803x_aneg_done has been dead code for more than 2
> > years now. Unreachable. And while it was reachable it was buggy and an
> > abuse of the phylib API. So you might want to just delete this function
> > instead. Context:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/30/375
>
> Are you sure? While it isn't called from phylib, it might be called from
> some drivers directly or indirectly if they use phy_speed_down().
> But it is questionable if this is much of a use then.
>
> That being said, if no one objects, I'd remove it, too.
It might, true, but it is certainly of no use.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-15 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-14 1:04 [PATCH net-next 0/2] net: phy: at803x: paging support Michael Walle
2021-02-14 1:04 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: phy: at803x: add pages support to AR8031/33 Michael Walle
2021-02-14 1:04 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: phy: at803x: use proper locking in at803x_aneg_done() Michael Walle
2021-02-14 1:57 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-14 2:18 ` Michael Walle
2021-02-14 2:24 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-02-14 20:48 ` Michael Walle
2021-02-15 21:32 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210215213206.qhjiyk4ahg75v6d2@skbuf \
--to=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox