netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: icplus: Call phy_restore_page() when phy_select_page() fails
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 17:28:38 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210217142838.GM2222@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YCy1F5xKFJAaLBFw@mwanda>

On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 09:17:59AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Smatch warns that there is a locking issue in this function:
> 
> drivers/net/phy/icplus.c:273 ip101a_g_config_intr_pin()
> warn: inconsistent returns '&phydev->mdio.bus->mdio_lock'.
>   Locked on  : 242
>   Unlocked on: 273
> 
> It turns out that the comments in phy_select_page() say we have to call
> phy_restore_page() even if the call to phy_select_page() fails.
> 
> Fixes: f9bc51e6cce2 ("net: phy: icplus: fix paged register access")

Don't apply this patch.  I have created a new Smatch warning for the
phy_select_page() behavior and it catches a couple similar bugs in the
same file.  I will send a v2 that fixes those as well.

regards,
dan carpenter


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-17 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-17  6:17 [PATCH net-next] net: phy: icplus: Call phy_restore_page() when phy_select_page() fails Dan Carpenter
2021-02-17  7:52 ` Michael Walle
2021-02-17 10:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-02-17 10:12   ` Michael Walle
2021-02-17 10:21     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-02-17 14:28 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2021-02-17 15:06   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-02-17 15:33     ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2021-02-17 17:06       ` Andrew Lunn
2021-02-17 21:24         ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210217142838.GM2222@kadam \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=michael@walle.cc \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).