From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A921AC433E0 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 09:15:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC5664EB8 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 09:15:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230102AbhBSJPv (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Feb 2021 04:15:51 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:51109 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230128AbhBSJN3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Feb 2021 04:13:29 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id EA70E67373; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:12:37 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:12:37 +0100 From: "hch@lst.de" To: Shai Malin Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" , "sagi@grimberg.me" , "hch@lst.de" , "axboe@fb.com" , "kbusch@kernel.org" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "kuba@kernel.org" , "Erik.Smith@dell.com" , "Douglas.Farley@dell.com" , Ariel Elior , Michal Kalderon , Prabhakar Kushwaha , Nikolay Assa , "malin1024@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/11] NVMeTCP Offload ULP and QEDN Device Driver Message-ID: <20210219091237.GA4036@lst.de> References: <20210207181324.11429-1-smalin@marvell.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 06:38:07PM +0000, Shai Malin wrote: > So, as there are no more comments / questions, we understand the direction > is acceptable and will proceed to the full series. I do not think we should support offloads at all, and certainly not onces requiring extra drivers. Those drivers have caused unbelivable pain for iSCSI and we should not repeat that mistake.