From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>,
Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 3/4] s390/qeth: schedule TX NAPI on QAOB completion
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 17:52:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210309165221.1735641-4-jwi@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210309165221.1735641-1-jwi@linux.ibm.com>
When a QAOB notifies us that a pending TX buffer has been delivered, the
actual TX completion processing by qeth_tx_complete_pending_bufs()
is done within the context of a TX NAPI instance. We shouldn't rely on
this instance being scheduled by some other TX event, but just do it
ourselves.
qeth_qdio_handle_aob() is called from qeth_poll(), ie. our main NAPI
instance. To avoid touching the TX queue's NAPI instance
before/after it is (un-)registered, reorder the code in qeth_open()
and qeth_stop() accordingly.
Fixes: 0da9581ddb0f ("qeth: exploit asynchronous delivery of storage blocks")
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c | 18 ++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
index 3763cd6d14f8..d0a56afec028 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
@@ -470,6 +470,7 @@ static void qeth_qdio_handle_aob(struct qeth_card *card,
struct qaob *aob;
struct qeth_qdio_out_buffer *buffer;
enum iucv_tx_notify notification;
+ struct qeth_qdio_out_q *queue;
unsigned int i;
aob = (struct qaob *) phys_to_virt(phys_aob_addr);
@@ -512,7 +513,9 @@ static void qeth_qdio_handle_aob(struct qeth_card *card,
buffer->is_header[i] = 0;
}
+ queue = buffer->q;
atomic_set(&buffer->state, QETH_QDIO_BUF_EMPTY);
+ napi_schedule(&queue->napi);
break;
default:
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
@@ -7235,9 +7238,7 @@ int qeth_open(struct net_device *dev)
card->data.state = CH_STATE_UP;
netif_tx_start_all_queues(dev);
- napi_enable(&card->napi);
local_bh_disable();
- napi_schedule(&card->napi);
if (IS_IQD(card)) {
struct qeth_qdio_out_q *queue;
unsigned int i;
@@ -7249,8 +7250,12 @@ int qeth_open(struct net_device *dev)
napi_schedule(&queue->napi);
}
}
+
+ napi_enable(&card->napi);
+ napi_schedule(&card->napi);
/* kick-start the NAPI softirq: */
local_bh_enable();
+
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qeth_open);
@@ -7260,6 +7265,11 @@ int qeth_stop(struct net_device *dev)
struct qeth_card *card = dev->ml_priv;
QETH_CARD_TEXT(card, 4, "qethstop");
+
+ napi_disable(&card->napi);
+ cancel_delayed_work_sync(&card->buffer_reclaim_work);
+ qdio_stop_irq(CARD_DDEV(card));
+
if (IS_IQD(card)) {
struct qeth_qdio_out_q *queue;
unsigned int i;
@@ -7280,10 +7290,6 @@ int qeth_stop(struct net_device *dev)
netif_tx_disable(dev);
}
- napi_disable(&card->napi);
- cancel_delayed_work_sync(&card->buffer_reclaim_work);
- qdio_stop_irq(CARD_DDEV(card));
-
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qeth_stop);
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-09 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-09 16:52 [PATCH net 0/4] s390/qeth: fixes 2021-03-09 Julian Wiedmann
2021-03-09 16:52 ` [PATCH net 1/4] s390/qeth: fix memory leak after failed TX Buffer allocation Julian Wiedmann
2021-03-09 16:52 ` [PATCH net 2/4] s390/qeth: improve completion of pending TX buffers Julian Wiedmann
2021-03-09 16:52 ` Julian Wiedmann [this message]
2021-03-09 16:52 ` [PATCH net 4/4] s390/qeth: fix notification for pending buffers during teardown Julian Wiedmann
2021-03-10 0:20 ` [PATCH net 0/4] s390/qeth: fixes 2021-03-09 patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210309165221.1735641-4-jwi@linux.ibm.com \
--to=jwi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).