netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>,
	Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Subject: [net-next 02/15] net/mlx5: Remove impossible checks of interface state
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 14:37:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210311223723.361301-3-saeed@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210311223723.361301-1-saeed@kernel.org>

From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>

The interface state is constant at this stage and checked
before calling to the register/unregister reserved GIDs.

There is no need to double check it.

Reviewed-by: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/gid.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/gid.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/gid.c
index a68738c8f4bc..97324d9d4f2a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/gid.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/lib/gid.c
@@ -55,10 +55,6 @@ void mlx5_cleanup_reserved_gids(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
 
 int mlx5_core_reserve_gids(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, unsigned int count)
 {
-	if (test_bit(MLX5_INTERFACE_STATE_UP, &dev->intf_state)) {
-		mlx5_core_err(dev, "Cannot reserve GIDs when interfaces are up\n");
-		return -EPERM;
-	}
 	if (dev->roce.reserved_gids.start < count) {
 		mlx5_core_warn(dev, "GID table exhausted attempting to reserve %d more GIDs\n",
 			       count);
@@ -79,7 +75,6 @@ int mlx5_core_reserve_gids(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, unsigned int count)
 
 void mlx5_core_unreserve_gids(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, unsigned int count)
 {
-	WARN(test_bit(MLX5_INTERFACE_STATE_UP, &dev->intf_state), "Unreserving GIDs when interfaces are up");
 	WARN(count > dev->roce.reserved_gids.count, "Unreserving %u GIDs when only %u reserved",
 	     count, dev->roce.reserved_gids.count);
 
-- 
2.29.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-11 22:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-11 22:37 [pull request][net-next 00/15] mlx5 updates 2021-03-11 Saeed Mahameed
2021-03-11 22:37 ` [net-next 01/15] net/mlx5: Don't skip vport check Saeed Mahameed
2021-03-12  0:30   ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2021-03-11 22:37 ` Saeed Mahameed [this message]
2021-03-11 22:37 ` [net-next 03/15] net/mlx5: Separate probe vs. reload flows Saeed Mahameed
2021-03-11 22:37 ` [net-next 04/15] net/mlx5: Remove second FW tracer check Saeed Mahameed
2021-03-11 22:37 ` [net-next 05/15] net/mlx5: Don't rely on interface state bit Saeed Mahameed
2021-03-11 22:37 ` [net-next 06/15] net/mlx5: Check returned value from health recover sequence Saeed Mahameed
2021-03-11 22:37 ` [net-next 07/15] net/mlx5e: CT, Avoid false lock dependency warning Saeed Mahameed
2021-03-11 22:37 ` [net-next 08/15] net/mlx5e: fix mlx5e_tc_tun_update_header_ipv6 dummy definition Saeed Mahameed
2021-03-11 22:37 ` [net-next 09/15] net/mlx5e: Add missing include Saeed Mahameed
2021-03-11 22:37 ` [net-next 10/15] net/mlx5: Fix indir stable stubs Saeed Mahameed
2021-03-11 22:37 ` [net-next 11/15] net/mlx5e: mlx5_tc_ct_init does not fail Saeed Mahameed
2021-03-11 22:37 ` [net-next 12/15] net/mlx5: SF, Fix return type Saeed Mahameed
2021-03-11 22:37 ` [net-next 13/15] net/mlx5e: rep: Improve reg_cX conditions Saeed Mahameed
2021-03-11 22:37 ` [net-next 14/15] net/mlx5: Avoid unnecessary operation Saeed Mahameed
2021-03-11 22:37 ` [net-next 15/15] net/mlx5e: Alloc flow spec using kvzalloc instead of kzalloc Saeed Mahameed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210311223723.361301-3-saeed@kernel.org \
    --to=saeed@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=moshe@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).