From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E01C433DB for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 06:58:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94FA364E4D for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 06:58:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229890AbhCOG6C (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Mar 2021 02:58:02 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:38340 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229742AbhCOG5p (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Mar 2021 02:57:45 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1030.google.com (mail-pj1-x1030.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1030]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4DEFC061574; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 23:57:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1030.google.com with SMTP id kk2-20020a17090b4a02b02900c777aa746fso14202846pjb.3; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 23:57:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=2WJG9vdfKxOZhSEaxthz6mUtiHSSJOtcmVCeDoWEgKw=; b=NW4bj6wiNRTsYnO7ZzWf1Z9lySTzcUUP3DCR4dAByrxAZn9Ska7TovcgusQW1r95ly 5zG0wAtCyLWdNbmw9betsOEm7soCXZCkFp3iSoFm8Rgvr6hOuAAEkEnPF4W5HHyuND3p IyCbeoqqwcKNTczZO7b7lRhEs3gVvaaY1MFdt4XD9f5MJ9zaPWa21QC3XSqdqIal+p4g zH8ARar3weTQ7knugIcTfVb/N8qPql+fPqgu3g+Pr1p1uyEn9l77UV679fsJjksv+ee4 MNSAzvmvxHZDk0FhmnTB/8oZ0y4UklH+gPg8Wtq4drueTOjs/+MC36wdFZf6nVwJXInr ZUpA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=2WJG9vdfKxOZhSEaxthz6mUtiHSSJOtcmVCeDoWEgKw=; b=tdWBxeBe1PCBO2LqzQl+pRQWF6qJ4c9F4MaYy7Y9ptPKuweiKBUPk3KD80BZOKZ4QA yaDuw1MYZz/r1RYHrAh6IdiADhMwjn5xQX7QBqgR9b7oqQftBa3NoHxMjGmOTiBxDsxf pD37rEiChSZ0WMUJBhz+6zmAFYPYNMy1dE1zPEUIQg2FrzfEFdn9Th9EX8Po6RjWirGl Dbs34HbOiNlQLzNmBYV1ggNebDLuqGuvulAl5nSvZEN3iY27uMbQ74oD28u12Fw4TuCf dNKGEwNzmVHaOEjif1nPNWz+NdbBIvpQ8Bvh+0zWVk5sqYTdwyApipm7yVfaPbZB0Sad s2CA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531HliKGLv6meekg/75uKV/kmUSTmGZ0BkHMwT7feZDXLwoF+onS 4JhWJqrUtLfYdGJln6K7tx0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy2CfR1Uf8f5FCVjhKz8jvGKp+9q6aJTYq68c4/UuCaJZ7bqrO7RNgjfYou0WLAxYSeiLHnSQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:5d10:: with SMTP id s16mr11370076pji.126.1615791465320; Sun, 14 Mar 2021 23:57:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Leo-laptop-t470s ([209.132.188.80]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s26sm12340280pfd.5.2021.03.14.23.57.42 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 14 Mar 2021 23:57:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 14:57:34 +0800 From: Hangbin Liu To: Daniel Borkmann Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski , Yi-Hung Wei , David Miller , bpf@vger.kernel.org, William Tu Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests/bpf: set gopt opt_class to 0 if get tunnel opt failed Message-ID: <20210315065734.GA2900@Leo-laptop-t470s> References: <20210309032214.2112438-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com> <20210312015617.GZ2900@Leo-laptop-t470s> <0b5c810b-5eec-c7b0-15fc-81c989494202@iogearbox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0b5c810b-5eec-c7b0-15fc-81c989494202@iogearbox.net> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 04:15:27PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > On 3/12/21 2:56 AM, Hangbin Liu wrote: > > Hi David, > > > > May I ask what's the status of this patch? From patchwork[1] the state is > > accepted. But I can't find the fix on net or net-next. > > I think there may have been two confusions, i) that $subject says that this goes > via net tree instead of bpf tree, which might have caused auto-delegation to move > this into 'netdev' patchwork reviewer bucket, and ii) the kernel patchwork bot then > had a mismatch as you noticed when it checked net-next after tree merge and replied > to the wrong patch of yours which then placed this one into 'accepted' state. I just > delegated it to bpf and placed it back under review.. > > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210309032214.2112438-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com/ Thanks Daniel, I thought the issue also exists on net tree and is a fixup. So I set the target to 'net'. Hangbin