From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>,
Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Hritik Vijay <hritikxx8@gmail.com>,
bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Linux-Net <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Work around a pahole limitation with zero-sized struct pagesets
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 10:04:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210527090422.GA30378@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YK9SiLX1E1KAZORb@infradead.org>
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 09:04:24AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 09:07:41AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > + !defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC) && \
> > + !defined(CONFIG_PAHOLE_HAS_ZEROSIZE_PERCPU_SUPPORT)
> > + /*
> > + * pahole 1.21 and earlier gets confused by zero-sized per-CPU
> > + * variables and produces invalid BTF. Ensure that
> > + * sizeof(struct pagesets) != 0 for older versions of pahole.
> > + */
> > + char __pahole_hack;
> > + #warning "pahole too old to support zero-sized struct pagesets"
> > +#endif
>
> Err, hell no. We should not mess up the kernel for broken tools that
> are not relevant to the kernel build itself ever.
What do you suggest as an alternative?
I added Arnaldo to the cc as he tagged the last released version of
pahole (1.21) and may be able to tag a 1.22 with Andrii's fix for pahole
included.
The most obvious alternative fix for this issue is to require pahole
1.22 to set CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF but obviously a version 1.22 that works
needs to exist first and right now it does not. I'd be ok with this but
users of DEBUG_INFO_BTF may object given that it'll be impossible to set
the option until there is a release.
The second alternative fix is to embed the local_lock
within struct per_cpu_pages. It was shown this was possible in
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rt-users/20210419141341.26047-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net/T/#md1001d7af52ac0d6d214b95e98fe051f9399de64
but I dropped it because it makes the locking protocol complex e.g.
config-specific lock-switchin in free_unref_page_list.
The last one is wrapping local_lock behind #defines and only defining the
per-cpu structures when local_lock_t is a non-zero size. That is simply
too ugly for words, the locking patterns should always be the same.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-27 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-26 8:07 [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: Work around a pahole limitation with zero-sized struct pagesets Mel Gorman
2021-05-26 8:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-05-26 8:33 ` (BTF) " Michal Suchánek
2021-05-26 9:00 ` Mel Gorman
2021-05-26 17:00 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-05-26 17:43 ` Michal Suchánek
2021-05-26 16:57 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-05-26 18:13 ` Mel Gorman
2021-05-26 18:41 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-05-27 8:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 9:04 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2021-05-27 9:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-27 14:37 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-05-27 14:41 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-05-28 8:09 ` David Laight
2021-05-28 9:04 ` Mel Gorman
2021-05-28 9:49 ` David Laight
2021-05-28 9:56 ` Michal Suchánek
2021-05-28 13:09 ` David Laight
2021-05-30 0:46 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210527090422.GA30378@techsingularity.net \
--to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hritikxx8@gmail.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).