From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <kafai@fb.com>,
"Song Liu" <songliubraving@fb.com>, "Yonghong Song" <yhs@fb.com>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"KP Singh" <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
"Jamal Hadi Salim" <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
"Vlad Buslov" <vladbu@nvidia.com>,
"Cong Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
"Jiri Pirko" <jiri@resnulli.us>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Joe Stringer" <joe@cilium.io>,
"Quentin Monnet" <quentin@isovalent.com>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC bpf-next 7/7] libbpf: add selftest for bpf_link based TC-BPF management API
Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 01:29:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210528195946.2375109-8-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210528195946.2375109-1-memxor@gmail.com>
This covers basic attach/detach/update, and tests interaction with the
netlink API. It also exercises the bpf_link_info and fdinfo codepaths.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_bpf_link.c | 285 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 285 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_bpf_link.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_bpf_link.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_bpf_link.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..beaf06e0557c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_bpf_link.c
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include <linux/pkt_cls.h>
+
+#include "test_tc_bpf.skel.h"
+
+#define LO_IFINDEX 1
+
+static int test_tc_bpf_link_basic(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook,
+ struct bpf_program *prog)
+{
+ DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_link_opts, opts, .handle = 1, .priority = 1);
+ DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, qopts, .handle = 1, .priority = 1);
+ struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
+ __u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
+ struct bpf_link *link, *invl;
+ int ret;
+
+ link = bpf_program__attach_tc(prog, hook, &opts);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_program__attach_tc"))
+ return PTR_ERR(link);
+
+ ret = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(bpf_program__fd(prog), &info, &info_len);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd"))
+ goto end;
+
+ ret = bpf_tc_query(hook, &qopts);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "bpf_tc_query"))
+ goto end;
+
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(qopts.prog_id, info.id, "prog_id match"))
+ goto end;
+
+ opts.gen_flags = ~0u;
+ invl = bpf_program__attach_tc(prog, hook, &opts);
+ if (!ASSERT_ERR_PTR(invl, "bpf_program__attach_tc with invalid flags")) {
+ bpf_link__destroy(invl);
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+end:
+ bpf_link__destroy(link);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int test_tc_bpf_link_netlink_interaction(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook,
+ struct bpf_program *prog)
+{
+ DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_link_update_opts, lopts,
+ .old_prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog));
+ DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_link_opts, opts, .handle = 1, .priority = 1);
+ DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, nopts, .handle = 1, .priority = 1);
+ DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, dopts, .handle = 1, .priority = 1);
+ struct bpf_link *link;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* We need to test the following cases:
+ * 1. BPF link owned filter cannot be replaced by netlink
+ * 2. Netlink owned filter cannot be replaced by BPF link
+ * 3. Netlink cannot do targeted delete of BPF link owned filter
+ * 4. Filter is actually deleted (with chain cleanup)
+ * We actually (ab)use the kernel behavior of returning EINVAL when
+ * target chain doesn't exist on tc_get_tfilter (which maps to
+ * bpf_tc_query) here, to know if the chain was really cleaned
+ * up on tcf_proto destruction. Our setup is so that there is
+ * only one reference to the chain.
+ *
+ * So on query, chain ? (filter ?: ENOENT) : EINVAL
+ */
+
+ link = bpf_program__attach_tc(prog, hook, &opts);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_program__attach_tc"))
+ return PTR_ERR(link);
+
+ nopts.prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog);
+ ret = bpf_tc_attach(hook, &nopts);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EEXIST, "bpf_tc_attach without replace"))
+ goto end;
+
+ nopts.flags = BPF_TC_F_REPLACE;
+ ret = bpf_tc_attach(hook, &nopts);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EPERM, "bpf_tc_attach with replace"))
+ goto end;
+
+ ret = bpf_tc_detach(hook, &dopts);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EPERM, "bpf_tc_detach"))
+ goto end;
+
+ lopts.flags = BPF_F_REPLACE;
+ ret = bpf_link_update(bpf_link__fd(link), bpf_program__fd(prog),
+ &lopts);
+ ASSERT_OK(ret, "bpf_link_update");
+ ret = ret < 0 ? -errno : ret;
+
+end:
+ bpf_link__destroy(link);
+ if (!ret && !ASSERT_EQ(bpf_tc_query(hook, &dopts), -EINVAL,
+ "chain empty delete"))
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int test_tc_bpf_link_update_ways(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook,
+ struct bpf_program *prog)
+{
+ DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_link_opts, opts, .handle = 1, .priority = 1);
+ DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_link_update_opts, uopts, 0);
+ struct test_tc_bpf *skel;
+ struct bpf_link *link;
+ int ret;
+
+ skel = test_tc_bpf__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_tc_bpf__open_and_load"))
+ return PTR_ERR(skel);
+
+ link = bpf_program__attach_tc(prog, hook, &opts);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_program__attach_tc")) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(link);
+ goto end;
+ }
+
+ ret = bpf_link_update(bpf_link__fd(link), bpf_program__fd(prog),
+ &uopts);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "bpf_link_update no old prog"))
+ goto end;
+
+ uopts.old_prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog);
+ ret = bpf_link_update(bpf_link__fd(link), bpf_program__fd(prog),
+ &uopts);
+ if (!ASSERT_TRUE(ret < 0 && errno == EINVAL,
+ "bpf_link_update with old prog without BPF_F_REPLACE")) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto end;
+ }
+
+ uopts.flags = BPF_F_REPLACE;
+ ret = bpf_link_update(bpf_link__fd(link), bpf_program__fd(prog),
+ &uopts);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "bpf_link_update with old prog with BPF_F_REPLACE"))
+ goto end;
+
+ uopts.old_prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.cls);
+ ret = bpf_link_update(bpf_link__fd(link), bpf_program__fd(prog),
+ &uopts);
+ if (!ASSERT_TRUE(ret < 0 && errno == EINVAL,
+ "bpf_link_update with wrong old prog")) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto end;
+ }
+ ret = 0;
+
+end:
+ test_tc_bpf__destroy(skel);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int test_tc_bpf_link_info_api(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook,
+ struct bpf_program *prog)
+{
+ DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_link_opts, opts, .handle = 1, .priority = 1);
+ __u32 ifindex, parent, handle, gen_flags, priority;
+ char buf[4096], path[256], *begin;
+ struct bpf_link_info info = {};
+ __u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
+ struct bpf_link *link;
+ int ret, fdinfo;
+
+ link = bpf_program__attach_tc(prog, hook, &opts);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "bpf_program__attach_tc"))
+ return PTR_ERR(link);
+
+ ret = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(bpf_link__fd(link), &info, &info_len);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd"))
+ goto end;
+
+ ret = snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/proc/self/fdinfo/%d",
+ bpf_link__fd(link));
+ if (!ASSERT_TRUE(!ret || ret < sizeof(path), "snprintf pathname"))
+ goto end;
+
+ fdinfo = open(path, O_RDONLY);
+ if (!ASSERT_GT(fdinfo, -1, "open fdinfo"))
+ goto end;
+
+ ret = read(fdinfo, buf, sizeof(buf));
+ if (!ASSERT_GT(ret, 0, "read fdinfo")) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto end_file;
+ }
+
+ begin = strstr(buf, "ifindex");
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(begin, "find beginning of fdinfo info")) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto end_file;
+ }
+
+ ret = sscanf(begin, "ifindex:\t%u\n"
+ "parent:\t%u\n"
+ "handle:\t%u\n"
+ "priority:\t%u\n"
+ "gen_flags:\t%u\n",
+ &ifindex, &parent, &handle, &priority, &gen_flags);
+ if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, 5, "sscanf fdinfo")) {
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+ goto end_file;
+ }
+
+ ret = -EINVAL;
+
+#define X(a, b, c) (!ASSERT_EQ(a, b, #a " == " #b) || !ASSERT_EQ(b, c, #b " == " #c))
+ if (X(info.tc.ifindex, ifindex, 1) ||
+ X(info.tc.parent, parent,
+ TC_H_MAKE(TC_H_CLSACT, TC_H_MIN_EGRESS)) ||
+ X(info.tc.handle, handle, 1) ||
+ X(info.tc.gen_flags, gen_flags, TCA_CLS_FLAGS_NOT_IN_HW) ||
+ X(info.tc.priority, priority, 1))
+#undef X
+ goto end_file;
+
+ ret = 0;
+
+end_file:
+ close(fdinfo);
+end:
+ bpf_link__destroy(link);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+void test_tc_bpf_link(void)
+{
+ DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_hook, hook, .ifindex = LO_IFINDEX,
+ .attach_point = BPF_TC_INGRESS);
+ struct test_tc_bpf *skel = NULL;
+ bool hook_created = false;
+ int ret;
+
+ skel = test_tc_bpf__open_and_load();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_tc_bpf__open_and_load"))
+ return;
+
+ ret = bpf_tc_hook_create(&hook);
+ if (ret == 0)
+ hook_created = true;
+
+ ret = ret == -EEXIST ? 0 : ret;
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "bpf_tc_hook_create(BPF_TC_INGRESS)"))
+ goto end;
+
+ ret = test_tc_bpf_link_basic(&hook, skel->progs.cls);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_tc_bpf_link_basic"))
+ goto end;
+
+ bpf_tc_hook_destroy(&hook);
+
+ hook.attach_point = BPF_TC_EGRESS;
+ ret = test_tc_bpf_link_basic(&hook, skel->progs.cls);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_tc_bpf_link_basic"))
+ goto end;
+
+ bpf_tc_hook_destroy(&hook);
+
+ ret = test_tc_bpf_link_netlink_interaction(&hook, skel->progs.cls);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_tc_bpf_link_netlink_interaction"))
+ goto end;
+
+ bpf_tc_hook_destroy(&hook);
+
+ ret = test_tc_bpf_link_update_ways(&hook, skel->progs.cls);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_tc_bpf_link_update_ways"))
+ goto end;
+
+ bpf_tc_hook_destroy(&hook);
+
+ ret = test_tc_bpf_link_info_api(&hook, skel->progs.cls);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_tc_bpf_link_info_api"))
+ goto end;
+
+end:
+ if (hook_created) {
+ hook.attach_point = BPF_TC_INGRESS | BPF_TC_EGRESS;
+ bpf_tc_hook_destroy(&hook);
+ }
+ test_tc_bpf__destroy(skel);
+}
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-28 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-28 19:59 [PATCH RFC bpf-next 0/7] Add bpf_link based TC-BPF API Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-05-28 19:59 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 1/7] net: sched: refactor cls_bpf creation code Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-05-28 19:59 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 2/7] bpf: export bpf_link functions for modules Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-05-28 19:59 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 3/7] net: sched: add bpf_link API for bpf classifier Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-06-02 20:56 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-05-28 19:59 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 4/7] net: sched: add lightweight update path for cls_bpf Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-05-28 19:59 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 5/7] tools: bpf.h: sync with kernel sources Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-05-28 19:59 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 6/7] libbpf: add bpf_link based TC-BPF management API Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-06-02 21:03 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-05-28 19:59 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2021-06-02 21:09 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 0/7] Add bpf_link based TC-BPF API Andrii Nakryiko
2021-06-02 21:45 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-06-02 23:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-06-04 6:43 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-06-06 23:37 ` Cong Wang
2021-06-07 3:37 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-06-07 5:18 ` Cong Wang
2021-06-07 6:07 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-06-08 2:00 ` Cong Wang
2021-06-08 7:19 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-06-08 15:39 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-06-11 2:10 ` Cong Wang
2021-06-11 2:00 ` Cong Wang
2021-06-13 2:53 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-06-13 20:27 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2021-06-13 20:34 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-06-13 21:10 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2021-06-14 13:03 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2021-06-15 23:07 ` Daniel Borkmann
2021-06-16 14:40 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2021-06-16 15:32 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-06-16 16:00 ` Daniel Borkmann
2021-06-18 11:40 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2021-06-18 14:38 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-06-18 14:50 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2021-06-18 16:23 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-06-18 16:41 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2021-06-18 22:42 ` Daniel Borkmann
2021-06-21 13:55 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2021-06-15 4:33 ` Cong Wang
2021-06-15 11:54 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-15 23:44 ` Daniel Borkmann
2021-06-16 12:03 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-16 15:33 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2021-06-13 3:08 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210528195946.2375109-8-memxor@gmail.com \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=joe@cilium.io \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quentin@isovalent.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=vladbu@nvidia.com \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).