From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2CB0C48BD1 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 16:20:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D426139A for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 16:20:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232185AbhFIQWT (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 12:22:19 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:55528 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229472AbhFIQWS (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 12:22:18 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 96BF2611AE; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 16:20:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1623255623; bh=X7M0xs0eGOmGuyMA4YS5bDY1/R9cG9+jlCsQLk+6Bk8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=f9wWN/fooTuhyCp0R8Jp2CjqYeL3J0UBFkIffvtnJYsNs3ToYGhvYKqEn5KHZDRXS bx/TPjiJWwkpgdpMPu08fRjiiZgYuAEBnVentnCTUZ/SwI0672IoGErniHzwjOi8s2 hSCD7whhOlz4fmTnDVg5Tg9pWdpuvB/1ZDBlkV553NotAMfXHpP4FnZD3j1hRPbvYX 1YJ3Kc/MNLLaKtORDj+KXiFUZOJwfDIssdnzwkDyJ4QpH0UUmmoFQHu+Yc1PmMU2S5 HUg7iCGgHi7Vj+PTnWZZgsh4udEep36w4UJFLg2SEcLjkMGxgP779G5TYteDa0wSlr UHdHP8jCEoMdg== Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 09:20:16 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Yunsheng Lin , , , , Cc: Vladimir Oltean , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] Some optimization for lockless qdisc Message-ID: <20210609092016.4c43192f@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <64aaa011-41a3-1e06-af02-909ff329ef7a@huawei.com> References: <1622684880-39895-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> <20210603113548.2d71b4d3@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <20210608125349.7azp7zeae3oq3izc@skbuf> <64aaa011-41a3-1e06-af02-909ff329ef7a@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 9 Jun 2021 09:31:39 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote: > On 2021/6/8 20:53, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 11:35:48AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > >> On Thu, 3 Jun 2021 09:47:57 +0800 Yunsheng Lin wrote: > >>> Patch 1: remove unnecessary seqcount operation. > >>> Patch 2: implement TCQ_F_CAN_BYPASS. > >>> Patch 3: remove qdisc->empty. > >>> > >>> Performance data for pktgen in queue_xmit mode + dummy netdev > >>> with pfifo_fast: > >>> > >>> threads unpatched patched delta > >>> 1 2.60Mpps 3.21Mpps +23% > >>> 2 3.84Mpps 5.56Mpps +44% > >>> 4 5.52Mpps 5.58Mpps +1% > >>> 8 2.77Mpps 2.76Mpps -0.3% > >>> 16 2.24Mpps 2.23Mpps +0.4% > >>> > >>> Performance for IP forward testing: 1.05Mpps increases to > >>> 1.16Mpps, about 10% improvement. > >> > >> Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski > > > > Any idea why these patches are deferred in patchwork? > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/1622684880-39895-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com/ > > I suppose it is a controversial change, which need more time > hanging to be reviewed and tested. That'd be my guess also. A review from area experts would be great, perhaps from Cong, John, Michal.. If the review doesn't come by Friday - I'd repost.