From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9632FC48BD1 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:38:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7885461040 for ; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 17:38:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230323AbhFJRkj (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:40:39 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59974 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229823AbhFJRki (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 13:40:38 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x632.google.com (mail-ej1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::632]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BBFDC061574; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:38:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x632.google.com with SMTP id ci15so427738ejc.10; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:38:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=1+01fpdAz6oGiXmjSnA5iELz52spEMgsysU/FzjkqH0=; b=hyM9O+zLFGbAi+DDCTmo0BkZBObbElydwddxNCHevP16AbiwOdV0+SDR0sSzPh50+f SMXl0LNEBIgmhFQ8JwntcTvltzPPJ1a6w51gPuoSrin+exoIaYdFJFVubHOBIEBwbZp8 LffZH9WInr82QExD9mZzmbrH8z6HTOUAvm8lq5eNHE806yUgNdV8hopn7d27e1e5c0DK lWORVAfk4lOIQZ+aFf4g5Id6GiEMEsaPv6BVwhpKFwqXHFmeWRCap+Lxm2W0VeN0eBD8 eL+X3WwJPBqroo2Xe68zQeeHkuCDhegnS/h+OQhuXIpURSIpu2BwfwyBUERJr5PrCCXO Q52w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=1+01fpdAz6oGiXmjSnA5iELz52spEMgsysU/FzjkqH0=; b=IIL/7+IHM9IEKrxiT6IpyknjlGipKtobI+US3EgBd11nUMSRW2Ix2BdRZ7+qR9Esyf T/oZB7/V0GcBCWPhrF5MGCw1Tq31alyFxsXpM0NSjbAtp0sPG9UfiNTdY0m5i29zZlaG LlqEw9dOLD5p7/FrEkgbfGBKfBwbwu0Z+MfA+vcTDiyuJdIPw3lSub8sgrjLGQL0MBV4 zJGFKmHrCZh3Yu6DDsRxn0dr+sQlsXRHxee7qFJNug198iEPqmPLsUSkWbFCPGaUOgfl 7cH7RxerttmUIvVIx5m6WBHtruQVvDFMSdz0+ahBhibooT2s1RTlJL8OULnJxPlByUVQ nJZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5336hQPyMn4X/AxviUTHdsxsjy8/zaLhPLTqFD1G836I4KlvbzhY 3JaAYroXOKmMWX7FhthZY98= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz+ZL/XX9PVH2VNIlKTm45Njkr8yH/gz/k8g5kZ5aJmRIn8MIBUEZJY/tFl+C7VJ3S0LjrRPA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:757:: with SMTP id z23mr656467ejb.537.1623346709693; Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:38:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from skbuf ([188.26.52.84]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j22sm1273174eje.123.2021.06.10.10.38.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Jun 2021 10:38:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2021 20:38:26 +0300 From: Vladimir Oltean To: Vadym Kochan Cc: "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , Taras Chornyi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mickey Rachamim , Vadym Kochan Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] net: marvell: prestera: add LAG support Message-ID: <20210610173826.pe6tyaipzfbb3gcu@skbuf> References: <20210610154311.23818-1-vadym.kochan@plvision.eu> <20210610160828.GB29315@plvision.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210610160828.GB29315@plvision.eu> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 07:08:28PM +0300, Vadym Kochan wrote: > Sorry, I did not mark it with a "net-next", will resend. Don't - let it simmer for a while, 24 hours at the very least is generally a good time to resend if there isn't any other feedback and you still want to make some changes. I think in this case it is pretty obvious that you are targeting net-next, so that wouldn't be enough of a reason to resent.