From: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
To: subashab@codeaurora.org, stranche@codeaurora.org,
davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org
Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 4/8] net: qualcomm: rmnet: return earlier for bad checksum
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 09:37:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210612143736.3498712-5-elder@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210612143736.3498712-1-elder@linaro.org>
In rmnet_map_ipv4_dl_csum_trailer(), if the sum of the trailer
checksum and the pseudo checksum is non-zero, checksum validation
has failed. We can return an error as soon as we know that.
We can do the same thing in rmnet_map_ipv6_dl_csum_trailer().
Add some comments that explain where we're headed.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
---
.../ethernet/qualcomm/rmnet/rmnet_map_data.c | 36 ++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/rmnet/rmnet_map_data.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/rmnet/rmnet_map_data.c
index 51909b8fa8a80..a05124eb8602e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/rmnet/rmnet_map_data.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/qualcomm/rmnet/rmnet_map_data.c
@@ -76,6 +76,17 @@ rmnet_map_ipv4_dl_csum_trailer(struct sk_buff *skb,
* We verified above that the IP header contributes zero to the
* trailer checksum. Therefore the checksum in the trailer is
* just the checksum computed over the IP payload.
+
+ * If the IP payload arrives intact, adding the pseudo header
+ * checksum to the IP payload checksum will yield 0xffff (negative
+ * zero). This means the trailer checksum and the pseudo checksum
+ * are additive inverses of each other. Put another way, the
+ * message passes the checksum test if the trailer checksum value
+ * is the negated pseudo header checksum.
+ *
+ * Knowing this, we don't even need to examine the transport
+ * header checksum value; it is already accounted for in the
+ * checksum value found in the trailer.
*/
ip_payload_csum = (__force __sum16)~csum_trailer->csum_value;
@@ -84,11 +95,11 @@ rmnet_map_ipv4_dl_csum_trailer(struct sk_buff *skb,
ip4h->protocol, 0);
pseudo_csum = csum16_add(ip_payload_csum, (__force __be16)pseudo_csum);
- /* The trailer checksum *includes* the checksum in the transport
- * header. Adding that to the pseudo checksum will yield 0xffff
- * ("negative 0") if the message arrived intact.
- */
- WARN_ON((__sum16)~pseudo_csum);
+ /* The cast is required to ensure only the low 16 bits are examined */
+ if ((__sum16)~pseudo_csum) {
+ priv->stats.csum_validation_failed++;
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
csum_value_final = ~csum16_sub(pseudo_csum, (__force __be16)*csum_field);
if (unlikely(!csum_value_final)) {
@@ -143,6 +154,11 @@ rmnet_map_ipv6_dl_csum_trailer(struct sk_buff *skb,
* transport checksum from this, we first subract the contribution
* of the IP header from the trailer checksum. We then add the
* checksum computed over the pseudo header.
+ *
+ * It's sufficient to compare the IP payload checksum with the
+ * negated pseudo checksum to determine whether the packet
+ * checksum was good. (See further explanation in comments
+ * in rmnet_map_ipv4_dl_csum_trailer()).
*/
ip_header_csum = (__force __be16)ip_fast_csum(ip6h, sizeof(*ip6h) / 4);
ip6_payload_csum = ~csum16_sub((__force __sum16)csum_trailer->csum_value,
@@ -155,10 +171,12 @@ rmnet_map_ipv6_dl_csum_trailer(struct sk_buff *skb,
length, ip6h->nexthdr, 0);
pseudo_csum = csum16_add(ip6_payload_csum, (__force __be16)pseudo_csum);
- /* Adding the payload checksum to the pseudo checksum yields 0xffff
- * ("negative 0") if the message arrived intact.
- */
- WARN_ON((__sum16)~pseudo_csum);
+ /* The cast is required to ensure only the low 16 bits are examined */
+ if ((__sum16)~pseudo_csum) {
+ priv->stats.csum_validation_failed++;
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
csum_value_final = ~csum16_sub(pseudo_csum, (__force __be16)*csum_field);
if (unlikely(csum_value_final == 0)) {
--
2.27.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-12 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-12 14:37 [PATCH net-next 0/8] net: qualcomm: rmnet: MAPv4 download checksum cleanup, part 2 Alex Elder
2021-06-12 14:37 ` [PATCH net-next 1/8] net: qualcomm: rmnet: remove some local variables Alex Elder
2021-06-12 14:37 ` [PATCH net-next 2/8] net: qualcomm: rmnet: rearrange some NOTs Alex Elder
2021-06-12 14:37 ` [PATCH net-next 3/8] net: qualcomm: rmnet: show that an intermediate sum is zero Alex Elder
2021-06-12 14:37 ` Alex Elder [this message]
2021-06-12 14:37 ` [PATCH net-next 5/8] net: qualcomm: rmnet: remove unneeded code Alex Elder
2021-06-12 14:37 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] net: qualcomm: rmnet: trailer value is a checksum Alex Elder
2021-06-12 14:37 ` [PATCH net-next 7/8] net: qualcomm: rmnet: drop some unary NOTs Alex Elder
2021-06-12 14:37 ` [PATCH net-next 8/8] net: qualcomm: rmnet: IPv6 payload length is simple Alex Elder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210612143736.3498712-5-elder@linaro.org \
--to=elder@linaro.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stranche@codeaurora.org \
--cc=subashab@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).