From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: steffen.klassert@secunet.com, sd@queasysnail.net,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Subject: [PATCH ipsec-next v2 3/5] xfrm: replay: remove recheck indirection
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 15:51:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210618135200.14420-4-fw@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210618135200.14420-1-fw@strlen.de>
Adds new xfrm_replay_recheck() helper and calls it from
xfrm input path instead of the indirection.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
include/net/xfrm.h | 4 +---
net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c | 2 +-
net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h
index a7f997b13198..3a219b34cb8c 100644
--- a/include/net/xfrm.h
+++ b/include/net/xfrm.h
@@ -309,9 +309,6 @@ struct xfrm_replay {
int (*check)(struct xfrm_state *x,
struct sk_buff *skb,
__be32 net_seq);
- int (*recheck)(struct xfrm_state *x,
- struct sk_buff *skb,
- __be32 net_seq);
int (*overflow)(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb);
};
@@ -1723,6 +1720,7 @@ static inline int xfrm_policy_id2dir(u32 index)
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
void xfrm_replay_advance(struct xfrm_state *x, __be32 net_seq);
void xfrm_replay_notify(struct xfrm_state *x, int event);
+int xfrm_replay_recheck(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 net_seq);
static inline int xfrm_aevent_is_on(struct net *net)
{
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
index c8971e4b33ab..8046ef1a6680 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
@@ -660,7 +660,7 @@ int xfrm_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, int encap_type)
/* only the first xfrm gets the encap type */
encap_type = 0;
- if (x->repl->recheck(x, skb, seq)) {
+ if (xfrm_replay_recheck(x, skb, seq)) {
XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMINSTATESEQERROR);
goto drop_unlock;
}
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c
index 9565b0f7d380..59391dc80fa3 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c
@@ -519,6 +519,22 @@ static int xfrm_replay_recheck_esn(struct xfrm_state *x,
return xfrm_replay_check_esn(x, skb, net_seq);
}
+int xfrm_replay_recheck(struct xfrm_state *x,
+ struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 net_seq)
+{
+ switch (x->repl_mode) {
+ case XFRM_REPLAY_MODE_LEGACY:
+ break;
+ case XFRM_REPLAY_MODE_BMP:
+ /* no special recheck treatment */
+ return xfrm_replay_check_bmp(x, skb, net_seq);
+ case XFRM_REPLAY_MODE_ESN:
+ return xfrm_replay_recheck_esn(x, skb, net_seq);
+ }
+
+ return xfrm_replay_check(x, skb, net_seq);
+}
+
static void xfrm_replay_advance_esn(struct xfrm_state *x, __be32 net_seq)
{
unsigned int bitnr, nr, i;
@@ -708,37 +724,31 @@ static int xfrm_replay_overflow_offload_esn(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff
static const struct xfrm_replay xfrm_replay_legacy = {
.check = xfrm_replay_check,
- .recheck = xfrm_replay_check,
.overflow = xfrm_replay_overflow_offload,
};
static const struct xfrm_replay xfrm_replay_bmp = {
.check = xfrm_replay_check_bmp,
- .recheck = xfrm_replay_check_bmp,
.overflow = xfrm_replay_overflow_offload_bmp,
};
static const struct xfrm_replay xfrm_replay_esn = {
.check = xfrm_replay_check_esn,
- .recheck = xfrm_replay_recheck_esn,
.overflow = xfrm_replay_overflow_offload_esn,
};
#else
static const struct xfrm_replay xfrm_replay_legacy = {
.check = xfrm_replay_check,
- .recheck = xfrm_replay_check,
.overflow = xfrm_replay_overflow,
};
static const struct xfrm_replay xfrm_replay_bmp = {
.check = xfrm_replay_check_bmp,
- .recheck = xfrm_replay_check_bmp,
.overflow = xfrm_replay_overflow_bmp,
};
static const struct xfrm_replay xfrm_replay_esn = {
.check = xfrm_replay_check_esn,
- .recheck = xfrm_replay_recheck_esn,
.overflow = xfrm_replay_overflow_esn,
};
#endif
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-18 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-18 13:51 [PATCH ipsec-next v2 0/5] xfrm: remove xfrm replay indirections Florian Westphal
2021-06-18 13:51 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v2 1/5] xfrm: replay: avoid xfrm replay notify indirection Florian Westphal
2021-06-18 13:51 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v2 2/5] xfrm: replay: remove advance indirection Florian Westphal
2021-06-18 13:51 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2021-06-18 13:51 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v2 4/5] xfrm: replay: avoid replay indirection Florian Westphal
2021-06-18 13:52 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v2 5/5] xfrm: replay: remove last " Florian Westphal
2021-06-22 7:07 ` [PATCH ipsec-next v2 0/5] xfrm: remove xfrm replay indirections Steffen Klassert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210618135200.14420-4-fw@strlen.de \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).