From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Martin KaFai Lau" <kafai@fb.com>,
"Hangbin Liu" <liuhangbin@gmail.com>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>,
"Magnus Karlsson" <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/19] Clean up and document RCU-based object protection for XDP and TC BPF
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:05:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210624160609.292325-1-toke@redhat.com> (raw)
During the discussion[0] of Hangbin's multicast patch series, Martin pointed out
that the lifetime of the RCU-protected map entries used by XDP_REDIRECT is by
no means obvious. I promised to look into cleaning this up, and Paul helpfully
provided some hints and a new unrcu_pointer() helper to aid in this.
It seems[1] that back in the early days of XDP, local_bh_disable() did not
provide RCU protection, which is why the rcu_read_lock() calls were added
to drivers in the first place. But according to Paul[2], in recent kernels
a local_bh_disable()/local_bh_enable() pair functions as one big RCU
read-side section, so no further protection is needed. This even applies to
-rt kernels, which has an explicit rcu_read_lock() in place as part of the
local_bh_disable()[3].
This patch series is mostly a documentation exercise, cleaning up the
description of the lifetime expectations and adding __rcu annotations so
sparse and lockdep can help verify it.
Patches 1-4 are preparatory: Patch 1 adds Paul's unrcu_pointer()
helper (which has already been added to his tree), which we need for some
of the operations in devmap, patches 2 and 3 update the RCU documentation
and patch 4 adds bh context as a valid condition for map lookups. Patch 5
is the main bit that adds the __rcu annotations and updates documentation
comments. Finally, patch 6 removes unneeded rcu_read_lock()s from TC BPF,
and the rest are patches updating the drivers, with one patch per distinct
maintainer.
Unfortunately I don't have any hardware to test any of the driver patches;
Jesper helpfully verified that it doesn't break anything on i40e, but the rest
of the driver patches are only compile-tested.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210415173551.7ma4slcbqeyiba2r@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com/
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/c5192ab3-1c05-8679-79f2-59d98299095b@iogearbox.net/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210417002301.GO4212@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210419165837.GA975577@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1/
Changelog:
v5:
- Rebase to bpf-next and fix build error
v4:
- Move comment about RCU protection into core instead of leaving it in
drivers
- Also remove rcu_read_lock() around TC BPF program execution
- Fold in a couple of patches from Paul updating the RCU documentation
v3:
- Remove one other unnecessary change to hlist_for_each_entry_rcu()
- Carry forward another ACK
v2:
- Add a comment about RCU protection to the drivers where rcu_read_lock()
is removed
- Drop unnecessary patch 3 which changed dev_get_by_index_rcu()
- Add some more text with the history to cover letter
- Fix a few places where the wrong RCU checks were used in cpumap and
xskmap code
- Carry forward ACKs
Paul E. McKenney (2):
rcu: Create an unrcu_pointer() to remove __rcu from a pointer
doc: Clarify and expand RCU updaters and corresponding readers
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen (17):
doc: Give XDP as example of non-obvious RCU reader/updater pairing
bpf: allow RCU-protected lookups to happen from bh context
xdp: add proper __rcu annotations to redirect map entries
sched: remove unneeded rcu_read_lock() around BPF program invocation
ena: remove rcu_read_lock() around XDP program invocation
bnxt: remove rcu_read_lock() around XDP program invocation
thunderx: remove rcu_read_lock() around XDP program invocation
freescale: remove rcu_read_lock() around XDP program invocation
net: intel: remove rcu_read_lock() around XDP program invocation
marvell: remove rcu_read_lock() around XDP program invocation
mlx4: remove rcu_read_lock() around XDP program invocation
nfp: remove rcu_read_lock() around XDP program invocation
qede: remove rcu_read_lock() around XDP program invocation
sfc: remove rcu_read_lock() around XDP program invocation
netsec: remove rcu_read_lock() around XDP program invocation
stmmac: remove rcu_read_lock() around XDP program invocation
net: ti: remove rcu_read_lock() around XDP program invocation
Documentation/RCU/checklist.rst | 55 ++++++++++++-------
drivers/net/ethernet/amazon/ena/ena_netdev.c | 3 -
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_xdp.c | 2 -
.../net/ethernet/cavium/thunder/nicvf_main.c | 2 -
.../net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa/dpaa_eth.c | 8 +--
.../net/ethernet/freescale/dpaa2/dpaa2-eth.c | 3 -
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c | 2 -
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_xsk.c | 3 -
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c | 6 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_xsk.c | 3 -
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 2 -
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c | 7 +--
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 2 -
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c | 3 -
.../net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 2 -
drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c | 2 -
.../net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c | 4 --
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c | 8 +--
.../ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_common.c | 2 -
drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_fp.c | 6 --
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx.c | 9 +--
drivers/net/ethernet/socionext/netsec.c | 3 -
.../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 10 +---
drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw_priv.c | 10 +---
include/linux/filter.h | 8 +--
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 14 +++++
include/net/xdp_sock.h | 2 +-
kernel/bpf/cpumap.c | 13 +++--
kernel/bpf/devmap.c | 49 +++++++----------
kernel/bpf/hashtab.c | 21 ++++---
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 6 +-
kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c | 6 +-
net/core/filter.c | 28 ++++++++++
net/sched/act_bpf.c | 2 -
net/sched/cls_bpf.c | 3 -
net/xdp/xsk.c | 4 +-
net/xdp/xsk.h | 4 +-
net/xdp/xskmap.c | 29 ++++++----
38 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 182 deletions(-)
--
2.32.0
next reply other threads:[~2021-06-24 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-24 16:05 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2021-06-24 16:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 01/19] rcu: Create an unrcu_pointer() to remove __rcu from a pointer Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 02/19] doc: Clarify and expand RCU updaters and corresponding readers Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 03/19] doc: Give XDP as example of non-obvious RCU reader/updater pairing Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 04/19] bpf: allow RCU-protected lookups to happen from bh context Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 05/19] xdp: add proper __rcu annotations to redirect map entries Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 06/19] sched: remove unneeded rcu_read_lock() around BPF program invocation Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 07/19] ena: remove rcu_read_lock() around XDP " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 08/19] bnxt: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 09/19] thunderx: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 10/19] freescale: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 11/19] net: intel: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 12/19] marvell: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 13/19] mlx4: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 14/19] nfp: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 15/19] qede: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 16/19] sfc: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 17/19] netsec: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 18/19] stmmac: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 19/19] net: ti: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 18:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/19] Clean up and document RCU-based object protection for XDP and TC BPF patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210624160609.292325-1-toke@redhat.com \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).