netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Martin KaFai Lau" <kafai@fb.com>,
	"Hangbin Liu" <liuhangbin@gmail.com>,
	"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>,
	"Magnus Karlsson" <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 06/19] sched: remove unneeded rcu_read_lock() around BPF program invocation
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 18:05:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210624160609.292325-7-toke@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210624160609.292325-1-toke@redhat.com>

The rcu_read_lock() call in cls_bpf and act_bpf are redundant: on the TX
side, there's already a call to rcu_read_lock_bh() in __dev_queue_xmit(),
and on RX there's a covering rcu_read_lock() in
netif_receive_skb{,_list}_internal().

With the previous patches we also amended the lockdep checks in the map
code to not require any particular RCU flavour, so we can just get rid of
the rcu_read_lock()s.

Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
---
 net/sched/act_bpf.c | 2 --
 net/sched/cls_bpf.c | 3 ---
 2 files changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sched/act_bpf.c b/net/sched/act_bpf.c
index e48e980c3b93..e409a0005717 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_bpf.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_bpf.c
@@ -43,7 +43,6 @@ static int tcf_bpf_act(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *act,
 	tcf_lastuse_update(&prog->tcf_tm);
 	bstats_cpu_update(this_cpu_ptr(prog->common.cpu_bstats), skb);
 
-	rcu_read_lock();
 	filter = rcu_dereference(prog->filter);
 	if (at_ingress) {
 		__skb_push(skb, skb->mac_len);
@@ -56,7 +55,6 @@ static int tcf_bpf_act(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tc_action *act,
 	}
 	if (skb_sk_is_prefetched(skb) && filter_res != TC_ACT_OK)
 		skb_orphan(skb);
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	/* A BPF program may overwrite the default action opcode.
 	 * Similarly as in cls_bpf, if filter_res == -1 we use the
diff --git a/net/sched/cls_bpf.c b/net/sched/cls_bpf.c
index 6e3e63db0e01..fa739efa59f4 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_bpf.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_bpf.c
@@ -85,8 +85,6 @@ static int cls_bpf_classify(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tcf_proto *tp,
 	struct cls_bpf_prog *prog;
 	int ret = -1;
 
-	/* Needed here for accessing maps. */
-	rcu_read_lock();
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(prog, &head->plist, link) {
 		int filter_res;
 
@@ -131,7 +129,6 @@ static int cls_bpf_classify(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct tcf_proto *tp,
 
 		break;
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.32.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-06-24 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-24 16:05 [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/19] Clean up and document RCU-based object protection for XDP and TC BPF Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 01/19] rcu: Create an unrcu_pointer() to remove __rcu from a pointer Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 02/19] doc: Clarify and expand RCU updaters and corresponding readers Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 03/19] doc: Give XDP as example of non-obvious RCU reader/updater pairing Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 04/19] bpf: allow RCU-protected lookups to happen from bh context Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 05/19] xdp: add proper __rcu annotations to redirect map entries Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:05 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2021-06-24 16:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 07/19] ena: remove rcu_read_lock() around XDP program invocation Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 08/19] bnxt: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 09/19] thunderx: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 10/19] freescale: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 11/19] net: intel: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 12/19] marvell: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 13/19] mlx4: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 14/19] nfp: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 15/19] qede: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 16/19] sfc: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 17/19] netsec: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 18/19] stmmac: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 16:06 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 19/19] net: ti: " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-06-24 18:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/19] Clean up and document RCU-based object protection for XDP and TC BPF patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210624160609.292325-7-toke@redhat.com \
    --to=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).