From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C23C07E9E for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 00:05:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB5561422 for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 00:05:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230070AbhGHAI2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jul 2021 20:08:28 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59374 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229729AbhGHAI2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jul 2021 20:08:28 -0400 Received: from rorschach.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9352261C42; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 00:05:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2021 20:05:44 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: LKML , syzbot+721aa903751db87aa244@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, Tetsuo Handa , Mathieu Desnoyers , Ingo Molnar , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , netdev , bpf Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracepoint: Add tracepoint_probe_register_may_exist() for BPF tracing Message-ID: <20210707200544.1fbfd42b@rorschach.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20210629095543.391ac606@oasis.local.home> <20210707184518.618ae497@rorschach.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 16:49:26 -0700 Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > As for why the user might need that, it's up to the user and I don't > want to speculate because it will always sound contrived without a > specific production use case. But people are very creative and we try > not to dictate how and what can be done if it doesn't break any > fundamental assumption and safety. I guess it doesn't matter, because if they try to do it, the second attachment will simply fail to attach. -- Steve