From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: Marek Behun <kabel@blackhole.sk>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, Ido Schimmel <idosch@idosch.org>,
Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@nvidia.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
"bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 00/24] Allow forwarding for the software bridge data path to be offloaded to capable devices
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 12:50:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210722095049.pym33fyuyu5b4gfs@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210712192711.126f2b35@thinkpad>
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 07:27:11PM +0200, Marek Behun wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2021 17:01:21 +0000
> Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Marek,
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 05:40:59PM +0200, Marek Behun wrote:
> > > Vladimir, on what mv88e6xxx devices are you developing this stuff?
> > > Do you use Turris MOX for this?
> >
> > I didn't develop the Marvell stuff nor did I come up with the idea
> > there, Tobias did. I also am not particularly interested in supporting
> > this for Marvell beyond making sure that the patches look simple and
> > okay, and pave the way for other drivers to do the same thing.
> >
> > I did my testing using a different DSA driver and extra patches which
> > I did not post here yet. I just reposted/adapted Tobias' work because
> > mv88e6xxx needs less work to support the TX data plane offload, and this
> > framework does need a first user to get accepted, so why delay it any
> > further if mv88e6xxx needs 2 patches whereas other drivers need 30.
> >
> > I did use the MOX for some minimal testing however, at least as far as
> > I could - there is this COMPHY SERDES bug in the bootloader which makes
> > the board fail to boot, and now the device tree workaround you gave me
> > does not appear to bypass the issue any longer or I didn't reaply it
> > properly.
>
> Sorry about that. Current upstream U-Boot solves this issue, but we did
> not release official update yet because there are still some things that
> need to be done. We have some RCs, though.
>
> If you are interested, it is pretty easy to upgrade:
> - MTD partition "secure-firmware" needs to be flashed with
> https://gitlab.nic.cz/turris/mox-boot-builder/uploads/8d5a17fae8f6e14ca11968ee5174c7ca/trusted-secure-firmware.bin
> (this file needs to be signed by CZ.NIC)
> - MTD partition "a53-firmware" (or "u-boot" in older DTS) needs to be
> flashed with
> https://secure.nic.cz/files/mbehun/a53-firmware.bin
> (this file can be built by users themselves)
Thanks. This worked in the sense that I could flash the trust zone
firmware and U-Boot, and net-next will boot without hanging, but now the
board is in a boot loop, due to what appears to be watchdog timer
expiration. This happens regardless of whether CONFIG_ARMADA_37XX_WATCHDOG
is set to y or n in the booted kernel.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-22 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-12 15:21 [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 00/24] Allow forwarding for the software bridge data path to be offloaded to capable devices Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 01/24] net: dpaa2-switch: use extack in dpaa2_switch_port_bridge_join Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-13 2:20 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 02/24] net: dpaa2-switch: refactor prechangeupper sanity checks Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-13 2:21 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 03/24] net: mlxsw: " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-13 2:21 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 04/24] net: ocelot: fix switchdev objects synced for wrong netdev with LAG offload Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 05/24] net: prestera: if the LAG that we're joining is under a bridge, join it Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 06/24] net: prestera: refactor prechangeupper sanity checks Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 07/24] net: bridge: disambiguate offload_fwd_mark Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 08/24] net: bridge: switchdev: recycle unused hwdoms Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 09/24] net: bridge: switchdev: let drivers inform which bridge ports are offloaded Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 10/24] net: prestera: guard against multiple switchdev obj replays on same bridge port Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 11/24] net: mlxsw: " Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 12/24] net: bridge: drop context pointer from br_fdb_replay Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 13/24] net: bridge: use the public notifier chain for br_fdb_replay Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 14/24] net: bridge: unexport call_switchdev_blocking_notifiers Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 15/24] net: bridge: propagate ctx to switchdev_port_obj_{add,del} Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 16/24] net: bridge: propagate ctx to br_switchdev_port_vlan_{add,del} Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 17/24] net: bridge: replay mdb entries on the public switchdev notifier chain Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 18/24] net: bridge: replay vlan entries on the public switchdev notifier Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 19/24] net: bridge: switchdev object replay helpers for everybody Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 20/24] net: bridge: switchdev: allow the TX data plane forwarding to be offloaded Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 21/24] net: dsa: track the number of switches in a tree Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 22/24] net: dsa: add support for bridge TX forwarding offload Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-15 14:49 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 23/24] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: map virtual bridges with forwarding offload in the PVT Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 24/24] net: dsa: tag_dsa: offload the bridge forwarding process Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 15:40 ` [RFC PATCH v3 net-next 00/24] Allow forwarding for the software bridge data path to be offloaded to capable devices Marek Behun
2021-07-12 17:01 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-07-12 17:27 ` Marek Behun
2021-07-22 9:50 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210722095049.pym33fyuyu5b4gfs@skbuf \
--to=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=idosch@idosch.org \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kabel@blackhole.sk \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikolay@nvidia.com \
--cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=tobias@waldekranz.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox