From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
To: Xiaoliang Yang <xiaoliang.yang_1@nxp.com>
Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"allan.nielsen@microchip.com" <allan.nielsen@microchip.com>,
"joergen.andreasen@microchip.com"
<joergen.andreasen@microchip.com>,
"UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
"vinicius.gomes@intel.com" <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>,
"michael.chan@broadcom.com" <michael.chan@broadcom.com>,
"vishal@chelsio.com" <vishal@chelsio.com>,
"saeedm@mellanox.com" <saeedm@mellanox.com>,
"jiri@mellanox.com" <jiri@mellanox.com>,
"idosch@mellanox.com" <idosch@mellanox.com>,
"alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>, Po Liu <po.liu@nxp.com>,
Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 net-next 4/8] net: mscc: ocelot: add gate and police action offload to PSFP
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 15:00:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210818150053.numtnvntscxcm6r4@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210818061922.12625-5-xiaoliang.yang_1@nxp.com>
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 02:19:18PM +0800, Xiaoliang Yang wrote:
> @@ -718,6 +734,15 @@ int ocelot_cls_flower_replace(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port,
> if (filter->type == OCELOT_VCAP_FILTER_DUMMY)
> return ocelot_vcap_dummy_filter_add(ocelot, filter);
>
> + if (filter->type == OCELOT_PSFP_FILTER_OFFLOAD) {
> + kfree(filter);
> + if (ocelot->ops->psfp_filter_add)
> + return ocelot->ops->psfp_filter_add(ocelot, f);
> +
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "PSFP chain is not supported in HW");
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + }
> +
> return ocelot_vcap_filter_add(ocelot, filter, f->common.extack);
> }
Hmm, I don't really like the idea of allocating an ocelot_vcap_filter
which we don't need for PSFP filters, just to kfree it later.
Is it that much more complicated to not allocate it at all in the first
place, add a bunch of "if" conditions that allocate a VCAP filter only
if we are offloading a VCAP chain?
And that means, don't create ocelot_vcap_filter::type == OCELOT_PSFP_FILTER_OFFLOAD,
because PSFP filters are not VCAP filters.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-18 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-18 6:19 [RFC v2 net-next 0/8] net: dsa: felix: psfp support on vsc9959 Xiaoliang Yang
2021-08-18 6:19 ` [RFC v2 net-next 1/8] net: mscc: ocelot: add MAC table write and lookup operations Xiaoliang Yang
2021-08-18 14:05 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-18 6:19 ` [RFC v2 net-next 2/8] net: mscc: ocelot: export MAC table lookup and write Xiaoliang Yang
2021-08-18 14:07 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-18 14:08 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-18 6:19 ` [RFC v2 net-next 3/8] net: mscc: ocelot: set vcap IS2 chain to goto PSFP chain Xiaoliang Yang
2021-08-18 14:54 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-19 9:49 ` Xiaoliang Yang
2021-08-18 6:19 ` [RFC v2 net-next 4/8] net: mscc: ocelot: add gate and police action offload to PSFP Xiaoliang Yang
2021-08-18 15:00 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2021-08-19 10:00 ` Xiaoliang Yang
2021-08-18 6:19 ` [RFC v2 net-next 5/8] net: dsa: felix: support psfp filter on vsc9959 Xiaoliang Yang
2021-08-18 18:58 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-08-18 6:19 ` [RFC v2 net-next 6/8] net: dsa: felix: add stream gate settings for psfp Xiaoliang Yang
2021-08-18 6:19 ` [RFC v2 net-next 7/8] net: mscc: ocelot: use index to set vcap policer Xiaoliang Yang
2021-08-18 6:19 ` [RFC v2 net-next 8/8] net: dsa: felix: use vcap policer to set flow meter for psfp Xiaoliang Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210818150053.numtnvntscxcm6r4@skbuf \
--to=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=allan.nielsen@microchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=idosch@mellanox.com \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=joergen.andreasen@microchip.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leoyang.li@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=po.liu@nxp.com \
--cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
--cc=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
--cc=vishal@chelsio.com \
--cc=xiaoliang.yang_1@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox