From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: zhoufeng <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>
Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, hawk@kernel.org,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
magnus.karlsson@intel.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, duanxiongchun@bytedance.com,
songmuchun@bytedance.com, zhouchengming@bytedance.com,
chenying.kernel@bytedance.com, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com,
wangdongdong.6@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] ixgbe: Fix NULL pointer dereference in ixgbe_xdp_setup
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2021 12:16:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210819101619.GE32204@ranger.igk.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5bddff53-9b78-99db-1d8e-23b3d38167a1@bytedance.com>
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 04:30:15PM +0800, zhoufeng wrote:
>
>
> 在 2021/8/17 下午7:10, Maciej Fijalkowski 写道:
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 03:54:07PM +0800, Feng zhou wrote:
> > > From: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>
> > >
> > > The ixgbe driver currently generates a NULL pointer dereference with
> > > some machine (online cpus < 63). This is due to the fact that the
> > > maximum value of num_xdp_queues is nr_cpu_ids. Code is in
> > > "ixgbe_set_rss_queues"".
> >
> > That's a good catch, but we should fix set channels callback so that it
> > will not allow a setting of queues to be higher than the
> > num_online_cpus().
> >
> > Please also include the tree in the patch subject that you're directing
> > the patch to.
> >
>
> Ok, Besides it, I will add more code in "ixgbe_set_channels":
> /* verify the number of channels does not exceed num_online_cpus */
> if (count > num_online_cpus())
> return -EINVAL;
> If user want set queues num to be higher than the num_online_cpus(),
> return error(-EINVAL).
>
> What do you think?
Yes, in general you can refer to
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool.c and in particular:
/**
* ice_get_max_rxq - return the maximum number of Rx queues for in a PF
* @pf: PF structure
*/
static int ice_get_max_rxq(struct ice_pf *pf)
{
return min3(pf->num_lan_msix, (u16)num_online_cpus(),
(u16)pf->hw.func_caps.common_cap.num_rxq);
}
>
> > I'd be also thankful if you Cc me on Intel XDP related patches.
> > Thanks!
> >
>
> Ok, of course.
>
>
> > >
> > > Here's how the problem repeats itself:
> > > Some machine (online cpus < 63), And user set num_queues to 63 through
> > > ethtool. Code is in the "ixgbe_set_channels",
> > > adapter->ring_feature[RING_F_FDIR].limit = count;
> > > It becames 63.
> > > When user use xdp, "ixgbe_set_rss_queues" will set queues num.
> > > adapter->num_rx_queues = rss_i;
> > > adapter->num_tx_queues = rss_i;
> > > adapter->num_xdp_queues = ixgbe_xdp_queues(adapter);
> > > And rss_i's value is from
> > > f = &adapter->ring_feature[RING_F_FDIR];
> > > rss_i = f->indices = f->limit;
> > > So "num_rx_queues" > "num_xdp_queues", when run to "ixgbe_xdp_setup",
> > > for (i = 0; i < adapter->num_rx_queues; i++)
> > > if (adapter->xdp_ring[i]->xsk_umem)
> > > lead to panic.
> > > Call trace:
> > > [exception RIP: ixgbe_xdp+368]
> > > RIP: ffffffffc02a76a0 RSP: ffff9fe16202f8d0 RFLAGS: 00010297
> > > RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000020 RCX: 0000000000000000
> > > RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000001c RDI: ffffffffa94ead90
> > > RBP: ffff92f8f24c0c18 R8: 0000000000000000 R9: 0000000000000000
> > > R10: ffff9fe16202f830 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff92f8f24c0000
> > > R13: ffff9fe16202fc01 R14: 000000000000000a R15: ffffffffc02a7530
> > > ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018
> > > 7 [ffff9fe16202f8f0] dev_xdp_install at ffffffffa89fbbcc
> > > 8 [ffff9fe16202f920] dev_change_xdp_fd at ffffffffa8a08808
> > > 9 [ffff9fe16202f960] do_setlink at ffffffffa8a20235
> > > 10 [ffff9fe16202fa88] rtnl_setlink at ffffffffa8a20384
> > > 11 [ffff9fe16202fc78] rtnetlink_rcv_msg at ffffffffa8a1a8dd
> > > 12 [ffff9fe16202fcf0] netlink_rcv_skb at ffffffffa8a717eb
> > > 13 [ffff9fe16202fd40] netlink_unicast at ffffffffa8a70f88
> > > 14 [ffff9fe16202fd80] netlink_sendmsg at ffffffffa8a71319
> > > 15 [ffff9fe16202fdf0] sock_sendmsg at ffffffffa89df290
> > > 16 [ffff9fe16202fe08] __sys_sendto at ffffffffa89e19c8
> > > 17 [ffff9fe16202ff30] __x64_sys_sendto at ffffffffa89e1a64
> > > 18 [ffff9fe16202ff38] do_syscall_64 at ffffffffa84042b9
> > > 19 [ffff9fe16202ff50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffffa8c0008c
> > >
> > > Fixes: 4a9b32f30f80 ("ixgbe: fix potential RX buffer starvation for
> > > AF_XDP")
> > > Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 8 ++++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> > > index 14aea40da50f..5db496cc5070 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> > > @@ -10112,6 +10112,7 @@ static int ixgbe_xdp_setup(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog)
> > > struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(dev);
> > > struct bpf_prog *old_prog;
> > > bool need_reset;
> > > + int num_queues;
> > > if (adapter->flags & IXGBE_FLAG_SRIOV_ENABLED)
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > @@ -10161,11 +10162,14 @@ static int ixgbe_xdp_setup(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog)
> > > /* Kick start the NAPI context if there is an AF_XDP socket open
> > > * on that queue id. This so that receiving will start.
> > > */
> > > - if (need_reset && prog)
> > > - for (i = 0; i < adapter->num_rx_queues; i++)
> > > + if (need_reset && prog) {
> > > + num_queues = min_t(int, adapter->num_rx_queues,
> > > + adapter->num_xdp_queues);
> > > + for (i = 0; i < num_queues; i++)
> > > if (adapter->xdp_ring[i]->xsk_pool)
> > > (void)ixgbe_xsk_wakeup(adapter->netdev, i,
> > > XDP_WAKEUP_RX);
> > > + }
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.11.0
> > >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-19 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-17 7:54 [PATCH] ixgbe: Fix NULL pointer dereference in ixgbe_xdp_setup Feng zhou
2021-08-17 11:10 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2021-08-18 8:30 ` [External] " zhoufeng
2021-08-19 10:16 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2021-08-20 2:47 ` zhoufeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210819101619.GE32204@ranger.igk.intel.com \
--to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenying.kernel@bytedance.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=wangdongdong.6@bytedance.com \
--cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
--cc=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
--cc=zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).