From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HK_RANDOM_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 308A6C433F5 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 17:06:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09CBE610A2 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 17:06:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1350213AbhICRHt (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Sep 2021 13:07:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47012 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229692AbhICRHs (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Sep 2021 13:07:48 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com (mail-ej1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30DE6C061575 for ; Fri, 3 Sep 2021 10:06:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id t19so13366955ejr.8 for ; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 10:06:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=HOu/v3Ra8O/K9wAzVGGkkdCqDDE4ksGmT9ZXUBUzYGg=; b=KnmLsWaI7nAt7v0Ohft67cbHe0UVPbSk6NVAkQtIoaSlqGCtJnY4vj/Z5/d8DmdH0q PpG6iLDQ8zvWYgQnI9JZIv5XKojAav5TWwf1WipJLHY8sArciIOAv4RLPVfHm+XtPnYK zkM6eKMW2zUDpWjD2dGBSh55SNPzYTzry8Fnd4JsCA+i8RtHXC6DMRk3Bx9U9WVqoIz1 NMKHMvFGebCB2hM6b4BcNAtXJuOE2NRw2M2sGNoDmQ8s8hOuuSf85sRB/gWiospKJ+oU nYf+uBSQDpbPhp4yihrbwTu62/KktDIt5h+15do+7BG5en9K+uJfvwV/sWKOVxCnfuTL TY/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=HOu/v3Ra8O/K9wAzVGGkkdCqDDE4ksGmT9ZXUBUzYGg=; b=MAIkO49sx/vjNH/zns8QYBrLlRpi4f5mkC4hT8OSVBGuHIEZaVDb8YJ23TtzILHRH+ gq+/bdhlpatDqLqO2FIGa72MGDovwQMuDgd7uFevhbOqknzGQ/juEiSKTgKgVj/tbqR7 AyInEC3o/DRX3XcfwNWd9Hsu1Ji+a1x747nggnFtwVZ1I3n1lnExmZXpLl7AMQCs8Rlh EpvifCsTsLSnsncqOLoMt86OH8nJej389FWyQQivO9Ehb5TjrR3DTIsC3OMKkRZlzIIh Z0/Mqq7qNxtcacY8eWUXUl/jXJHZ7miG6NUdJmbP/dp0Ez1rfaep+WPYt4gb6dCGilWM U3xw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532HRS/kD9D8MQQApHdgMa+BasRnEh+fbO5Ildc8poxU2k7FO2P+ AjPvExKHtaosEDkIunThwdc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzPnEbkASDevNel7TFli2FZVnwLYltOLsIxSrGReTUvtVmamE8eTtUuKExvTMbbAuvH1eZSfQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:919:: with SMTP id i25mr5225893ejd.171.1630688806742; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 10:06:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from skbuf ([82.78.148.104]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id rl23sm3124463ejb.50.2021.09.03.10.06.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 03 Sep 2021 10:06:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Ioana Ciornei X-Google-Original-From: Ioana Ciornei Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 20:06:45 +0300 To: Andrew Lunn Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" , Ioana Ciornei , Heiner Kallweit , "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Ioana Ciornei , Jakub Kicinski Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dpaa2-mac: add support for more ethtool 10G link modes Message-ID: <20210903170645.pkejqmg2ayw3ijgr@skbuf> References: <20210720141134.GT22278@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20210816144752.vxliq642uipdsmdd@skbuf> <20210903103358.GU22278@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20210903110916.bjjm6x3h4l4raf27@skbuf> <20210903113434.GV22278@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 03, 2021 at 03:11:36PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > Thanks. I wonder why searching for it via google and also via patchworks > > search facility didn't find it. > > > > So, it got incorrectly tagged by netdev maintainers, presumably because > > they're too quick to classify a patch while discussion on the patch was > > still ongoing - and there's no way for those discussing that to ever > > know without finding it in patchwork. Which is pretty much impossible > > unless you know the patchwork URL format and message ID, and are > > prepared to regularly poll the patchwork website. > > > > The netdev process, as a patch submitter or reviewer, is really very > > unfriendly. > > H Russell, Ioana > > It sounds like at LPC there is going to be a time slot to talk about > netdev processes. Is this on the Networking track? I didn't find any session that would appear to target this topic. > I would like to find out and discuss the new policy > for the time it takes to merge patches. Patchwork issues, and the lack > of integration with email workflows could be another interesting topic > to discuss. It would be interesting to have patchwork send a notification of some sorts to the submitter when a certain patch set's state was changed. Ioana