netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: "Florian Fainelli" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	"Andrew Lunn" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	"Vivien Didelot" <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	"Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: dsa: b53: Clean up CPU/IMP ports
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 13:00:51 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210917100051.254mzlfxwvaromcn@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1568bbc3-1652-7d01-2fc7-cb4189c71ad2@gmail.com>

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 12:19:02AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 16.09.2021 23:46, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > On 9/16/21 9:23 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> > > On 9/16/21 5:03 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> > > > From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> > > > 
> > > > This has been tested on:
> > > > 
> > > > 1. Luxul XBR-4500 with used CPU port 5
> > > > [    8.361438] b53-srab-switch 18007000.ethernet-switch: found switch: BCM53012, rev 0
> > > > 
> > > > 2. Netgear R8000 with used CPU port 8
> > > > [    4.453858] b53-srab-switch 18007000.ethernet-switch: found switch: BCM53012, rev 5
> > > 
> > > These look good at first glance, let me give them a try on 7445 and 7278
> > > at least before responding with Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags, thanks!
> > > 
> > Found some issues on 7445 and 7278 while moving to the latest net-next
> > which I will be addressing but this worked nicely.
> > 
> > What do you think about removing dev->enabled_ports and
> > b53_for_each_port entirely and using a DSA helper that iterates over the
> > switch's port list? Now that we have dev->num_ports accurately reflect
> > the number of ports it should be equivalent.
> 
> The limitation I see in DSA is skipping unavailable ports. E.g. BCM5301x
> switches that don't have port 6. The closest match for such case I found
> is DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED but I'm not sure if it's enough to handle those
> cases.
> 
> That DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED would probably require investigating DSA & b53
> behaviour *and* discussing it with DSA maintainer to make sure we don't
> abuse that.

How absent are these ports in hardware? For DSA_PORT_TYPE_UNUSED we do
register a devlink port, but if those ports are really not present in
hardware, I'm thinking maybe the easiest way would be to supply a
ds->disabled_port_mask before dsa_register_switch(), and DSA will simply
skip those ports when allocating the dp, the devlink_port etc. So you
will literally have nothing for them.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-17 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-16 12:03 [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: dsa: b53: Clean up CPU/IMP ports Rafał Miłecki
2021-09-16 12:03 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: dsa: b53: Include all ports in "enabled_ports" Rafał Miłecki
2021-09-16 21:44   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-09-16 12:03 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: dsa: b53: Drop BCM5301x workaround for a wrong CPU/IMP port Rafał Miłecki
2021-09-16 21:44   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-09-16 12:03 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: dsa: b53: Improve flow control setup on BCM5301x Rafał Miłecki
2021-09-16 21:44   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-09-16 12:03 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] net: dsa: b53: Drop unused "cpu_port" field Rafał Miłecki
2021-09-16 21:44   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-09-16 16:23 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] net: dsa: b53: Clean up CPU/IMP ports Florian Fainelli
2021-09-16 21:46   ` Florian Fainelli
2021-09-16 22:19     ` Rafał Miłecki
2021-09-17 10:00       ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2021-09-17 12:21         ` Andrew Lunn
2021-09-17 12:31           ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-09-17 16:39         ` Florian Fainelli
2021-09-17  2:58 ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210917100051.254mzlfxwvaromcn@skbuf \
    --to=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    --cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).