From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: conntrack: serialize hash resizes and cleanups
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 11:20:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210919092002.GG15906@breakpoint.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210917221556.1162846-1-eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>
> Syzbot was able to trigger the following warning [1]
>
> No repro found by syzbot yet but I was able to trigger similar issue
> by having 2 scripts running in parallel, changing conntrack hash sizes,
> and:
>
> for j in `seq 1 1000` ; do unshare -n /bin/true >/dev/null ; done
>
> It would take more than 5 minutes for net_namespace structures
> to be cleaned up.
>
> This is because nf_ct_iterate_cleanup() has to restart everytime
> a resize happened.
>
> By adding a mutex, we can serialize hash resizes and cleanups
> and also make get_next_corpse() faster by skipping over empty
> buckets.
>
> Even without resizes in the picture, this patch considerably
> speeds up network namespace dismantles.
LGTM, thanks Eric.
I have been working on patches to make hash table pernet again,
but they will take a bit more time to finish and are not suited for -net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-19 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-17 22:15 [PATCH nf] netfilter: conntrack: serialize hash resizes and cleanups Eric Dumazet
2021-09-19 9:20 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2021-09-21 1:51 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210919092002.GG15906@breakpoint.cc \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).