public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pshelar@ovn.org,
	dsahern@kernel.org
Cc: Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, dev@openvswitch.org, ltomasbo@redhat.com,
	echaudro@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH net-next] openvswitch: allow linking a VRF to an OVS bridge
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 17:34:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210920153454.433252-1-atenart@kernel.org> (raw)

VRF devices are prevented from being added to upper devices since commit
1017e0987117 ("vrf: prevent adding upper devices") as they set the
IFF_NO_RX_HANDLER flag. However attaching a VRF to an OVS bridge is a
valid use case[1].

Allow a VRF device to be attached to an OVS bridge by having an OVS
specific tweak. This approach allows not to change a valid logic
elsewhere and the IFF_NO_RX_HANDLER limitation still applies for non-OVS
upper devices, even after a VRF was unlinked from an OVS bridge.

(Patch not sent as a fix as the commit introducing the limitation is not
recent).

[1] https://ltomasbo.wordpress.com/2021/06/25/openstack-networking-with-evpn/

Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org>
---

Hi all,

I thought about other ways to fix this but did not want to add yet
another flag, nor to add specific logic outside of net/openvswitch/. A
custom netdev_rx_handler_register having priv_flags as a parameter could
also have been added, but again that seemed a bit invasive.

There might be questions about the setup in which a VRF is linked to an
OVS bridge; I cc'ed Luis Tomás who wrote the article.

Thanks,
Antoine

 net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c b/net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c
index 8e1a88f13622..e76b2477d384 100644
--- a/net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/vport-netdev.c
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ static struct net_device *get_dpdev(const struct datapath *dp)
 
 struct vport *ovs_netdev_link(struct vport *vport, const char *name)
 {
+	unsigned int saved_flags;
 	int err;
 
 	vport->dev = dev_get_by_name(ovs_dp_get_net(vport->dp), name);
@@ -98,8 +99,17 @@ struct vport *ovs_netdev_link(struct vport *vport, const char *name)
 	if (err)
 		goto error_unlock;
 
+	/* While IFF_NO_RX_HANDLER is rightly set for l3 masters (VRF) as they
+	 * don't work with upper devices, they can be attached to OVS bridges.
+	 */
+	saved_flags = vport->dev->priv_flags;
+	if (netif_is_l3_master(vport->dev))
+		vport->dev->priv_flags &= ~IFF_NO_RX_HANDLER;
+
 	err = netdev_rx_handler_register(vport->dev, netdev_frame_hook,
 					 vport);
+	vport->dev->priv_flags = saved_flags;
+
 	if (err)
 		goto error_master_upper_dev_unlink;
 
-- 
2.31.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-09-20 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-20 15:34 Antoine Tenart [this message]
2021-09-20 15:45 ` [PATCH net-next] openvswitch: allow linking a VRF to an OVS bridge David Ahern
2021-09-21  8:12   ` Luis Tomas Bolivar
2021-09-21 11:20     ` Luis Tomas Bolivar
2021-09-21 11:40       ` Antoine Tenart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210920153454.433252-1-atenart@kernel.org \
    --to=atenart@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=ltomasbo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox