From: Wong Vee Khee <vee.khee.wong@linux.intel.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Wong Vee Khee <veekhee@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: pcs: xpcs: fix incorrect CL37 AN sequence
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2021 19:45:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210929114522.GA2089@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210928102730.72vays22sulixodb@skbuf>
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 10:27:31AM +0000, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 12:19:38PM +0800, Wong Vee Khee wrote:
> > According to Synopsys DesignWare Cores Ethernet PCS databook, it is
> > required to disable Clause 37 auto-negotiation by programming bit-12
> > (AN_ENABLE) to 0 if it is already enabled, before programming various
> > fields of VR_MII_AN_CTRL registers.
> >
> > After all these programming are done, it is then required to enable
> > Clause 37 auto-negotiation by programming bit-12 (AN_ENABLE) to 1.
> >
> > Cc: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Wong Vee Khee <vee.khee.wong@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
>
>
>
> > drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
> > index da8c81d25edd..eacfb32bb229 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
> > @@ -709,11 +709,14 @@ static int xpcs_config_aneg_c37_sgmii(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs, unsigned int mode)
> > int ret;
> >
> > /* For AN for C37 SGMII mode, the settings are :-
> > - * 1) VR_MII_AN_CTRL Bit(2:1)[PCS_MODE] = 10b (SGMII AN)
> > - * 2) VR_MII_AN_CTRL Bit(3) [TX_CONFIG] = 0b (MAC side SGMII)
> > + * 1) VR_MII_MMD_CTRL Bit(12) [AN_ENABLE] = 0b (Disable SGMII AN in case
> > + it is already enabled)
> > + * 2) VR_MII_AN_CTRL Bit(2:1)[PCS_MODE] = 10b (SGMII AN)
> > + * 3) VR_MII_AN_CTRL Bit(3) [TX_CONFIG] = 0b (MAC side SGMII)
> > * DW xPCS used with DW EQoS MAC is always MAC side SGMII.
> > - * 3) VR_MII_DIG_CTRL1 Bit(9) [MAC_AUTO_SW] = 1b (Automatic
> > + * 4) VR_MII_DIG_CTRL1 Bit(9) [MAC_AUTO_SW] = 1b (Automatic
> > * speed/duplex mode change by HW after SGMII AN complete)
> > + * 5) VR_MII_MMD_CTRL Bit(12) [AN_ENABLE] = 1b (Enable SGMII AN)
> > *
> > * Note: Since it is MAC side SGMII, there is no need to set
> > * SR_MII_AN_ADV. MAC side SGMII receives AN Tx Config from
> > @@ -721,6 +724,11 @@ static int xpcs_config_aneg_c37_sgmii(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs, unsigned int mode)
> > * between PHY and Link Partner. There is also no need to
> > * trigger AN restart for MAC-side SGMII.
> > */
> > + ret = xpcs_modify(xpcs, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, DW_VR_MII_MMD_CTRL, AN_CL37_EN,
>
> Would you mind using "MDIO_CTRL1" instead of "DW_VR_MII_MMD_CTRL", and
> "MDIO_AN_CTRL1_ENABLE" instead of "AN_CL37_EN"? After all, the
> "SR_MII_CTRL" naming from the data book comes from "Standard Register".
>
> > + 0);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > ret = xpcs_read(xpcs, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, DW_VR_MII_AN_CTRL);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > return ret;
> > @@ -745,7 +753,15 @@ static int xpcs_config_aneg_c37_sgmii(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs, unsigned int mode)
> > else
> > ret &= ~DW_VR_MII_DIG_CTRL1_MAC_AUTO_SW;
> >
> > - return xpcs_write(xpcs, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, DW_VR_MII_DIG_CTRL1, ret);
> > + ret = xpcs_write(xpcs, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, DW_VR_MII_DIG_CTRL1, ret);
>
> There is an interesting note in the data book about the MAC_AUTO_SW bit:
>
> | This mode is valid only when DWC_xpcs is configured as MAC-side
> | SGMII/USXGMII/QSGMII and should be set only when Auto-negotiation is
> | enabled (AN_ENABLE bit is set to 1).
>
> With your patch, it will be set while the AN_ENABLE bit is zero.
> I wonder whether that's a poor choice of words, because it does
> contradict with the sequence described in section "7.12.1 SGMII
> Auto-Negotiation", and if it just means "only set MAC_AUTO_SW if you
> intend to eventually set AN_ENABLE", not "you must set it only _while_
> AN_ENABLE is set".
>
I am actually following what is described in section "7.12.1 SGMII
Auto-Negotiation". I guess it is more accurate to follow what is
described in there.
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = xpcs_read(xpcs, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, DW_VR_MII_MMD_CTRL);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > + ret |= AN_CL37_EN;
>
> So this is the part that really confuses me.
> The xpcs driver did not use to do any configuration at all for this bit.
> Am I right in assuming that we were all operating with the default value?
> Because in your case, the default value is set by your bootloader
> (AN_CL37_EN is set), and in my case, the default is the hardware reset
> (AN_CL37_EN is not set). I think (haven't tested) that this change would
> actually break my setups where phylink_autoneg_inband(mode) returns false.
>
> So could you please add this conditional?
>
> if (phylink_autoneg_inband(mode))
> ret |= MDIO_AN_CTRL1_ENABLE;
> else
> ret &= ~MDIO_AN_CTRL1_ENABLE;
>
Added this. I will still use 'AN_CL37_EN' instead of
'MDIO_AN_CTRL1_ENABLE' for now. Let's rename all 'AN_CL37_EN' to
'MDIO_AN_CTRL1_ENABLE' later on net-next.
> > + return xpcs_write(xpcs, MDIO_MMD_VEND2, DW_VR_MII_MMD_CTRL, ret);
> > }
> >
> > static int xpcs_config_2500basex(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs)
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-29 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-28 4:19 [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: pcs: xpcs: introduce xpcs_modify() helper function Wong Vee Khee
2021-09-28 4:19 ` Wong Vee Khee
2021-09-28 4:19 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: pcs: xpcs: fix incorrect CL37 AN sequence Wong Vee Khee
2021-09-28 10:27 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-09-29 11:45 ` Wong Vee Khee [this message]
2021-09-28 10:41 ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-09-29 11:46 ` Wong Vee Khee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210929114522.GA2089@linux.intel.com \
--to=vee.khee.wong@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=veekhee@gmail.com \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).