From: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
To: Andrea Claudi <aclaudi@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, stephen@networkplumber.org,
dsahern@gmail.com, bluca@debian.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2 v3 1/3] configure: support --param=value style
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2021 10:09:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211006080944.GA32194@orbyte.nwl.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <caa9b65bef41acd51d45e45e1a158edb1eeefe7d.1633455436.git.aclaudi@redhat.com>
Hi Andrea,
A remark regarding coding style:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 12:08:04AM +0200, Andrea Claudi wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/configure b/configure
> index 7f4f3bd9..d57ce0f8 100755
> --- a/configure
> +++ b/configure
> @@ -501,18 +501,30 @@ if [ $# -eq 1 ] && [ "$(echo $1 | cut -c 1)" != '-' ]; then
> else
> while true; do
> case "$1" in
> - --include_dir)
> - INCLUDE=$2
> - shift 2 ;;
> - --libbpf_dir)
> - LIBBPF_DIR="$2"
> - shift 2 ;;
> - --libbpf_force)
> - if [ "$2" != 'on' ] && [ "$2" != 'off' ]; then
> + --include_dir | --include_dir=*)
So here the code combines the two cases,
> + INCLUDE="${1#*=}"
> + if [ "$INCLUDE" == "--include_dir" ]; then
just to fiddle it apart again. Did you consider leaving the old cases in
place and adding separate ones for the --opt=val cases like so:
| --include_dir=*)
| INCLUDE="${1#*=}"
| shift
| ;;
[...]
> + --libbpf_force | --libbpf_force=*)
> + LIBBPF_FORCE="${1#*=}"
> + if [ "$LIBBPF_FORCE" == "--libbpf_force" ]; then
> + LIBBPF_FORCE="$2"
> + shift
> + fi
> + if [ "$LIBBPF_FORCE" != 'on' ] && [ "$LIBBPF_FORCE" != 'off' ]; then
To avoid duplication here, I would move semantic checks into a second
step. This would allow for things like:
| --libbpf_force=invalid --libbpf_force=on
but separating the syntactic parsing from semantic checks might be
beneficial by itself, too.
Cheers, Phil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-06 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-05 22:08 [PATCH iproute2 v3 0/3] configure: add support for libdir and prefix option Andrea Claudi
2021-10-05 22:08 ` [PATCH iproute2 v3 1/3] configure: support --param=value style Andrea Claudi
2021-10-06 8:09 ` Phil Sutter [this message]
2021-10-06 9:49 ` Andrea Claudi
2021-10-06 10:18 ` Phil Sutter
2021-10-06 14:27 ` David Ahern
2021-10-05 22:08 ` [PATCH iproute2 v3 2/3] configure: add the --prefix option Andrea Claudi
2021-10-05 22:08 ` [PATCH iproute2 v3 3/3] configure: add the --libdir option Andrea Claudi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211006080944.GA32194@orbyte.nwl.cc \
--to=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=aclaudi@redhat.com \
--cc=bluca@debian.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).