* [PATCH][next] ice: use devm_kcalloc() instead of devm_kzalloc()
@ 2021-10-06 18:09 Gustavo A. R. Silva
2021-10-21 17:05 ` Kees Cook
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2021-10-06 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jesse Brandeburg, Tony Nguyen, David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski
Cc: intel-wired-lan, netdev, linux-kernel, Gustavo A. R. Silva,
linux-hardening
Use 2-factor multiplication argument form devm_kcalloc() instead
of devm_kzalloc().
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool_fdir.c | 4 ++--
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool_fdir.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool_fdir.c
index 16de603b280c..38960bcc384c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool_fdir.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ethtool_fdir.c
@@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ ice_create_init_fdir_rule(struct ice_pf *pf, enum ice_fltr_ptype flow)
if (!seg)
return -ENOMEM;
- tun_seg = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*seg) * ICE_FD_HW_SEG_MAX,
+ tun_seg = devm_kcalloc(dev, sizeof(*seg), ICE_FD_HW_SEG_MAX,
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tun_seg) {
devm_kfree(dev, seg);
@@ -1068,7 +1068,7 @@ ice_cfg_fdir_xtrct_seq(struct ice_pf *pf, struct ethtool_rx_flow_spec *fsp,
if (!seg)
return -ENOMEM;
- tun_seg = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*seg) * ICE_FD_HW_SEG_MAX,
+ tun_seg = devm_kcalloc(dev, sizeof(*seg), ICE_FD_HW_SEG_MAX,
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tun_seg) {
devm_kfree(dev, seg);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c
index 13b2bdc25b0d..fd10f8548feb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c
@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ int ice_setup_tx_ring(struct ice_ring *tx_ring)
/* warn if we are about to overwrite the pointer */
WARN_ON(tx_ring->tx_buf);
tx_ring->tx_buf =
- devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*tx_ring->tx_buf) * tx_ring->count,
+ devm_kcalloc(dev, sizeof(*tx_ring->tx_buf), tx_ring->count,
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tx_ring->tx_buf)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ int ice_setup_rx_ring(struct ice_ring *rx_ring)
/* warn if we are about to overwrite the pointer */
WARN_ON(rx_ring->rx_buf);
rx_ring->rx_buf =
- devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*rx_ring->rx_buf) * rx_ring->count,
+ devm_kcalloc(dev, sizeof(*rx_ring->rx_buf), rx_ring->count,
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!rx_ring->rx_buf)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.27.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH][next] ice: use devm_kcalloc() instead of devm_kzalloc()
2021-10-06 18:09 [PATCH][next] ice: use devm_kcalloc() instead of devm_kzalloc() Gustavo A. R. Silva
@ 2021-10-21 17:05 ` Kees Cook
2021-10-21 17:35 ` Nguyen, Anthony L
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2021-10-21 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gustavo A. R. Silva
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg, Tony Nguyen, David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski,
intel-wired-lan, netdev, linux-kernel, linux-hardening
On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 01:09:08PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Use 2-factor multiplication argument form devm_kcalloc() instead
> of devm_kzalloc().
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Similar patch state here, it seems? Who needs to Ack this?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20211006180908.GA913430@embeddedor/
Thanks!
--
Kees Cook
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][next] ice: use devm_kcalloc() instead of devm_kzalloc()
2021-10-21 17:05 ` Kees Cook
@ 2021-10-21 17:35 ` Nguyen, Anthony L
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nguyen, Anthony L @ 2021-10-21 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: keescook@chromium.org, gustavoars@kernel.org
Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
Brandeburg, Jesse, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
kuba@kernel.org
On Thu, 2021-10-21 at 10:05 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2021 at 01:09:08PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> > Use 2-factor multiplication argument form devm_kcalloc() instead
> > of devm_kzalloc().
> >
> > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>
> Similar patch state here, it seems? Who needs to Ack this?
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20211006180908.GA913430@embeddedor/
It was reviewed/ack'd and recently accepted here:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20211019183027.2820413-10-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com/
Thanks,
Tony
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-21 17:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-10-06 18:09 [PATCH][next] ice: use devm_kcalloc() instead of devm_kzalloc() Gustavo A. R. Silva
2021-10-21 17:05 ` Kees Cook
2021-10-21 17:35 ` Nguyen, Anthony L
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).