From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Jakub Sitnicki" <jakub@cloudflare.com>,
"Song Liu" <songliubraving@fb.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <kafai@fb.com>, "Yonghong Song" <yhs@fb.com>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 7/8] selftests/bpf: Fix fd cleanup in sk_lookup test
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 02:26:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211014205644.1837280-8-memxor@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211014205644.1837280-1-memxor@gmail.com>
Similar to the fix in commit:
e31eec77e4ab ("bpf: selftests: Fix fd cleanup in get_branch_snapshot")
We use designated initializer to set fds to -1 without breaking on
future changes to MAX_SERVER constant denoting the array size.
The particular close(0) occurs on non-reuseport tests, so it can be seen
with -n 115/{2,3} but not 115/4. This can cause problems with future
tests if they depend on BTF fd never being acquired as fd 0, breaking
internal libbpf assumptions.
Fixes: 0ab5539f8584 ("selftests/bpf: Tests for BPF_SK_LOOKUP attach point")
Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c
index aee41547e7f4..cbee46d2d525 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sk_lookup.c
@@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ static void query_lookup_prog(struct test_sk_lookup *skel)
static void run_lookup_prog(const struct test *t)
{
- int server_fds[MAX_SERVERS] = { -1 };
+ int server_fds[] = { [0 ... MAX_SERVERS - 1] = -1 };
int client_fd, reuse_conn_fd = -1;
struct bpf_link *lookup_link;
int i, err;
@@ -663,8 +663,9 @@ static void run_lookup_prog(const struct test *t)
if (reuse_conn_fd != -1)
close(reuse_conn_fd);
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(server_fds); i++) {
- if (server_fds[i] != -1)
- close(server_fds[i]);
+ if (server_fds[i] == -1)
+ break;
+ close(server_fds[i]);
}
bpf_link__destroy(lookup_link);
}
@@ -1053,7 +1054,7 @@ static void run_sk_assign(struct test_sk_lookup *skel,
struct bpf_program *lookup_prog,
const char *remote_ip, const char *local_ip)
{
- int server_fds[MAX_SERVERS] = { -1 };
+ int server_fds[] = { [0 ... MAX_SERVERS - 1] = -1 };
struct bpf_sk_lookup ctx;
__u64 server_cookie;
int i, err;
@@ -1097,8 +1098,9 @@ static void run_sk_assign(struct test_sk_lookup *skel,
close_servers:
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(server_fds); i++) {
- if (server_fds[i] != -1)
- close(server_fds[i]);
+ if (server_fds[i] == -1)
+ break;
+ close(server_fds[i]);
}
}
--
2.33.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-14 20:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-14 20:56 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/8] Typeless/weak ksym for gen_loader + misc fixups Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-10-14 20:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/8] bpf: Add bpf_kallsyms_lookup_name helper Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-10-20 18:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-10-14 20:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/8] libbpf: Add typeless ksym support to gen_loader Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-10-15 6:51 ` Song Liu
2021-10-14 20:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/8] libbpf: Add weak " Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-10-15 6:51 ` Song Liu
2021-10-14 20:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/8] libbpf: Ensure that BPF syscall fds are never 0, 1, or 2 Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-10-14 20:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 5/8] libbpf: Use O_CLOEXEC uniformly when opening fds Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-10-15 6:52 ` Song Liu
2021-10-14 20:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 6/8] selftests/bpf: Add weak/typeless ksym test for light skeleton Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2021-10-15 6:58 ` Song Liu
2021-10-14 20:56 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2021-10-14 20:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 8/8] selftests/bpf: Fix memory leak in test_ima Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211014205644.1837280-8-memxor@gmail.com \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).