netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] selftests/bpf: Fix possible/online index mismatch in perf_buffer test
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 13:41:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211021114132.8196-3-jolsa@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211021114132.8196-1-jolsa@kernel.org>

The perf_buffer fails on system with offline cpus:

  # test_progs -t perf_buffer
  serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_cpus 0 nsec
  serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:nr_on_cpus 0 nsec
  serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:skel_load 0 nsec
  serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:attach_kprobe 0 nsec
  serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buf__new 0 nsec
  serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:epoll_fd 0 nsec
  skipping offline CPU #4
  serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:perf_buffer__poll 0 nsec
  serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:seen_cpu_cnt 0 nsec
  serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:buf_cnt 0 nsec
  ...
  serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:fd_check 0 nsec
  serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:drain_buf 0 nsec
  serial_test_perf_buffer:PASS:consume_buf 0 nsec
  serial_test_perf_buffer:FAIL:cpu_seen cpu 5 not seen
  #88 perf_buffer:FAIL
  Summary: 0/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED

If the offline cpu is from the middle of the possible set,
we get mismatch with possible and online cpu buffers.

The perf buffer test calls perf_buffer__consume_buffer for
all 'possible' cpus, but the library holds only 'online'
cpu buffers and perf_buffer__consume_buffer returns them
based on index.

Adding extra (online) index to keep track of online buffers,
we need the original (possible) index to trigger trace on
proper cpu.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c  | 13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c
index 877600392851..0b0cd045979b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ int trigger_on_cpu(int cpu)
 
 void serial_test_perf_buffer(void)
 {
-	int err, on_len, nr_on_cpus = 0, nr_cpus, i;
+	int err, on_len, nr_on_cpus = 0, nr_cpus, i, j;
 	struct perf_buffer_opts pb_opts = {};
 	struct test_perf_buffer *skel;
 	cpu_set_t cpu_seen;
@@ -111,15 +111,15 @@ void serial_test_perf_buffer(void)
 		  "got %zu, expected %d\n", perf_buffer__buffer_cnt(pb), nr_on_cpus))
 		goto out_close;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++) {
+	for (i = 0, j = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++) {
 		if (i >= on_len || !online[i])
 			continue;
 
-		fd = perf_buffer__buffer_fd(pb, i);
+		fd = perf_buffer__buffer_fd(pb, j);
 		CHECK(fd < 0 || last_fd == fd, "fd_check", "last fd %d == fd %d\n", last_fd, fd);
 		last_fd = fd;
 
-		err = perf_buffer__consume_buffer(pb, i);
+		err = perf_buffer__consume_buffer(pb, j);
 		if (CHECK(err, "drain_buf", "cpu %d, err %d\n", i, err))
 			goto out_close;
 
@@ -127,12 +127,13 @@ void serial_test_perf_buffer(void)
 		if (trigger_on_cpu(i))
 			goto out_close;
 
-		err = perf_buffer__consume_buffer(pb, i);
-		if (CHECK(err, "consume_buf", "cpu %d, err %d\n", i, err))
+		err = perf_buffer__consume_buffer(pb, j);
+		if (CHECK(err, "consume_buf", "cpu %d, err %d\n", j, err))
 			goto out_close;
 
 		if (CHECK(!CPU_ISSET(i, &cpu_seen), "cpu_seen", "cpu %d not seen\n", i))
 			goto out_close;
+		j++;
 	}
 
 out_free_pb:
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-21 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-21 11:41 [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] selftests/bpf: Fixes for perf_buffer test Jiri Olsa
2021-10-21 11:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] selftests/bpf: Fix perf_buffer test on system with offline cpus Jiri Olsa
2021-10-21 11:41 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2021-10-21 11:41 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: Use nanosleep tracepoint in perf buffer test Jiri Olsa
2021-10-21 19:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] selftests/bpf: Fixes for perf_buffer test John Fastabend
2021-10-21 23:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-10-17 21:14 [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] selftests/bpf: Fix perf_buffer test on system with offline cpus Jiri Olsa
2021-10-17 21:14 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] selftests/bpf: Fix possible/online index mismatch in perf_buffer test Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211021114132.8196-3-jolsa@kernel.org \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).