From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF846C433F5 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:51:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A455F611C4 for ; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:51:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229807AbhJ2PyH (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Oct 2021 11:54:07 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:52100 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229623AbhJ2PyG (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Oct 2021 11:54:06 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B874760F9C; Fri, 29 Oct 2021 15:51:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1635522698; bh=h1cSS8JltbM3YyzLa3nuxhbVdj0z9HevxYcWiaL8O/E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=QzV9nHfUVh/SB2eJfmFNEjFl2pZLqI9ZwZ7+dExpVe7qZKxu3c75vnShZSeatWSnp 59DEM0BZtHy54BzXgermuPUTwix04rxkMRO/Q5l7C5FSkBEe5TZCaXHGsHPx5w+Krx RMsl+EMffImSApPel68Vg7GpFbsrvXELr1NLK5Ap5P0I/TUWlx3DfIYrWQtXxpj0jG XJ3Zvl4ZG644W6K1ow4OPQuEud69n6uf/TuP4hFmKZLzfoFSEgqZS2fohkkSGYKyzJ mkq71401r/izrNMzr5/Tt/oKBfGXd7dqYm8SvRxgTU+OKohaZAgzqPrIcp4AWmXYOf YmCUIQrRijInw== From: Jakub Kicinski To: davem@davemloft.net, willemb@google.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, dsahern@kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski Subject: [PATCH net 0/2] udp6: allow SO_MARK ctrl msg to affect routing Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 08:51:33 -0700 Message-Id: <20211029155135.468098-1-kuba@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Hi! Looks like SO_MARK from cmsg does not affect routing policy. This seems accidental. I opted for net because of the discrepancy between IPv4 and IPv6, but it never worked and doesn't cause crashes.. Jakub Kicinski (2): udp6: allow SO_MARK ctrl msg to affect routing selftests: udp: test for passing SO_MARK as cmsg net/ipv6/udp.c | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/net/.gitignore | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile | 2 + tools/testing/selftests/net/cmsg_so_mark.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/net/cmsg_so_mark.sh | 61 +++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/net/cmsg_so_mark.c create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/net/cmsg_so_mark.sh base-commit: 6de6e46d27ef386feecdbea56b3bfd6c3b3bc1f9 -- 2.31.1