From: Benedikt Spranger <b.spranger@linutronix.de>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: bage@linutronix.de, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: phy: phy_ethtool_ksettings_set: Don't discard phy_start_aneg's return
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:06:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211108160653.3d6127df@mitra> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YYkzbE39ERAxzg4k@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 14:25:48 +0000
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 03:18:34PM +0100, bage@linutronix.de wrote:
> > From: Bastian Germann <bage@linutronix.de>
> >
> > Take the return of phy_start_aneg into account so that ethtool will
> > handle negotiation errors and not silently accept invalid input.
>
> I don't think this description is accurate. If we get to call
> phy_start_aneg() with invalid input, then something has already
> gone wrong.
The MDI/MDIX/auto-MDIX settings are not checked before calling
phy_start_aneg(). If the PHY supports forcing MDI and auto-MDIX, but
not forcing MDIX _phy_start_aneg() returns a failure, which is silently
ignored.
> As Andrew has already explained, an error from this
> function means that something went wrong with PHY communication.
Or for MDI/MDIX setings, the PHY does not support a feature/setting.
> All validation should have happened prior to this function being
> called.
OK.
Just to be clear: The PHY driver should check the settings and return
an error before calling phy_ethtool_ksettings_set() ?
Thanks
Bene
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-08 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-05 15:36 [PATCH] phy: phy_ethtool_ksettings_set: Don't discard phy_start_aneg's return bage
2021-11-05 18:32 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-11-08 14:21 ` Bastian Germann
2021-11-06 21:52 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-11-08 14:25 ` Bastian Germann
2021-11-10 8:14 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-11-08 14:18 ` [PATCH net v2] net: " bage
2021-11-08 14:25 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-11-08 15:06 ` Benedikt Spranger [this message]
2021-11-08 15:40 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-11-08 16:09 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-11-08 16:32 ` Bastian Germann
2021-11-08 17:57 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-11-08 18:01 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-11-08 18:06 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-11-08 19:02 ` Benedikt Spranger
2021-11-08 19:35 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-11-09 18:29 ` Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211108160653.3d6127df@mitra \
--to=b.spranger@linutronix.de \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bage@linutronix.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).