Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.co.jp>
To: <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: <benh@amazon.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
	<kuni1840@gmail.com>, <kuniyu@amazon.co.jp>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 13/13] af_unix: Relax race in unix_autobind().
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 11:24:46 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211109022446.25282-1-kuniyu@amazon.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1d2e0a47-a486-0991-91e2-fed54163898e@gmail.com>

From:   Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Nov 2021 15:10:24 -0800
> On 11/6/21 2:17 AM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > When we bind an AF_UNIX socket without a name specified, the kernel selects
> > an available one from 0x00000 to 0xFFFFF.  unix_autobind() starts searching
> > from a number in the 'static' variable and increments it after acquiring
> > two locks.
> > 
> > If multiple processes try autobind, they obtain the same lock and check if
> > a socket in the hash list has the same name.  If not, one process uses it,
> > and all except one end up retrying the _next_ number (actually not, it may
> > be incremented by the other processes).  The more we autobind sockets in
> > parallel, the longer the latency gets.  We can avoid such a race by
> > searching for a name from a random number.
> > 
> > These show latency in unix_autobind() while 64 CPUs are simultaneously
> > autobind-ing 1024 sockets for each.
> > 
> >   Without this patch:
> > 
> >      usec          : count     distribution
> >         0          : 1176     |***                                     |
> >         2          : 3655     |***********                             |
> >         4          : 4094     |*************                           |
> >         6          : 3831     |************                            |
> >         8          : 3829     |************                            |
> >         10         : 3844     |************                            |
> >         12         : 3638     |***********                             |
> >         14         : 2992     |*********                               |
> >         16         : 2485     |*******                                 |
> >         18         : 2230     |*******                                 |
> >         20         : 2095     |******                                  |
> >         22         : 1853     |*****                                   |
> >         24         : 1827     |*****                                   |
> >         26         : 1677     |*****                                   |
> >         28         : 1473     |****                                    |
> >         30         : 1573     |*****                                   |
> >         32         : 1417     |****                                    |
> >         34         : 1385     |****                                    |
> >         36         : 1345     |****                                    |
> >         38         : 1344     |****                                    |
> >         40         : 1200     |***                                     |
> > 
> >   With this patch:
> > 
> >      usec          : count     distribution
> >         0          : 1855     |******                                  |
> >         2          : 6464     |*********************                   |
> >         4          : 9936     |********************************        |
> >         6          : 12107    |****************************************|
> >         8          : 10441    |**********************************      |
> >         10         : 7264     |***********************                 |
> >         12         : 4254     |**************                          |
> >         14         : 2538     |********                                |
> >         16         : 1596     |*****                                   |
> >         18         : 1088     |***                                     |
> >         20         : 800      |**                                      |
> >         22         : 670      |**                                      |
> >         24         : 601      |*                                       |
> >         26         : 562      |*                                       |
> >         28         : 525      |*                                       |
> >         30         : 446      |*                                       |
> >         32         : 378      |*                                       |
> >         34         : 337      |*                                       |
> >         36         : 317      |*                                       |
> >         38         : 314      |*                                       |
> >         40         : 298      |                                        |
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.co.jp>
> > ---
> >  net/unix/af_unix.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> > index 643f0358bf7a..55d570b23475 100644
> > --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c
> > +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c
> > @@ -1075,8 +1075,7 @@ static int unix_autobind(struct sock *sk)
> >  	unsigned int new_hash, old_hash = sk->sk_hash;
> >  	struct unix_sock *u = unix_sk(sk);
> >  	struct unix_address *addr;
> > -	unsigned int retries = 0;
> > -	static u32 ordernum = 1;
> > +	u32 initnum, ordernum;
> >  	int err;
> >  
> >  	err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&u->bindlock);
> > @@ -1091,31 +1090,33 @@ static int unix_autobind(struct sock *sk)
> >  	if (!addr)
> >  		goto out;
> >  
> > +	addr->len = offsetof(struct sockaddr_un, sun_path) + 6;
> >  	addr->name->sun_family = AF_UNIX;
> >  	refcount_set(&addr->refcnt, 1);
> >  
> > +	initnum = ordernum = prandom_u32();
> >  retry:
> > -	addr->len = sprintf(addr->name->sun_path + 1, "%05x", ordernum) +
> > -		offsetof(struct sockaddr_un, sun_path) + 1;
> > +	ordernum = (ordernum + 1) & 0xFFFFF;
> > +	sprintf(addr->name->sun_path + 1, "%05x", ordernum);
> >  
> >  	new_hash = unix_abstract_hash(addr->name, addr->len, sk->sk_type);
> >  	unix_table_double_lock(old_hash, new_hash);
> > -	ordernum = (ordernum+1)&0xFFFFF;
> >  
> >  	if (__unix_find_socket_byname(sock_net(sk), addr->name, addr->len, new_hash)) {
> >  		unix_table_double_unlock(old_hash, new_hash);
> >  
> > -		/*
> > -		 * __unix_find_socket_byname() may take long time if many names
> > +		/* __unix_find_socket_byname() may take long time if many names
> >  		 * are already in use.
> >  		 */
> >  		cond_resched();
> > -		/* Give up if all names seems to be in use. */
> > -		if (retries++ == 0xFFFFF) {
> > +
> > +		if (ordernum == initnum) {
> 
> Infinite loop alert, in the likely case initnum >= 2^16

Good catch!
Thank you for reviewing.

And I'm sorry for distraction in the merge window.
I'll post v2 after that.


> 
> > +			/* Give up if all names seems to be in use. */
> >  			err = -ENOSPC;
> > -			kfree(addr);
> > +			unix_release_addr(addr);
> >  			goto out;
> >  		}
> > +
> >  		goto retry;
> >  	}
> >  
> > 

      reply	other threads:[~2021-11-09  2:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-06  9:16 [PATCH net-next 00/13] af_unix: Replace unix_table_lock with per-hash locks Kuniyuki Iwashima
2021-11-06  9:17 ` [PATCH net-next 01/13] af_unix: Use offsetof() instead of sizeof() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2021-11-06  9:17 ` [PATCH net-next 02/13] af_unix: Pass struct sock to unix_autobind() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2021-11-06  9:17 ` [PATCH net-next 03/13] af_unix: Factorise unix_find_other() based on address types Kuniyuki Iwashima
2021-11-06  9:17 ` [PATCH net-next 04/13] af_unix: Return an error as a pointer in unix_find_other() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2021-11-06  9:17 ` [PATCH net-next 05/13] af_unix: Cut unix_validate_addr() out of unix_mkname() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2021-11-06  9:17 ` [PATCH net-next 06/13] af_unix: Copy unix_mkname() into unix_find_(bsd|abstract)() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2021-11-06  9:17 ` [PATCH net-next 07/13] af_unix: Remove unix_mkname() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2021-11-06  9:17 ` [PATCH net-next 08/13] af_unix: Allocate unix_address in unix_bind_(bsd|abstract)() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2021-11-06  9:17 ` [PATCH net-next 09/13] af_unix: Remove UNIX_ABSTRACT() macro and test sun_path[0] instead Kuniyuki Iwashima
2021-11-06  9:17 ` [PATCH net-next 10/13] af_unix: Add helpers to calculate hashes Kuniyuki Iwashima
2021-11-06  9:17 ` [PATCH net-next 11/13] af_unix: Save hash in sk_hash Kuniyuki Iwashima
2021-11-06  9:17 ` [PATCH net-next 12/13] af_unix: Replace the big lock with small locks Kuniyuki Iwashima
2021-11-10  6:39   ` [af_unix] 95e381b609: WARNING:possible_recursive_locking_detected kernel test robot
2021-11-06  9:17 ` [PATCH net-next 13/13] af_unix: Relax race in unix_autobind() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2021-11-08 23:10   ` Eric Dumazet
2021-11-09  2:24     ` Kuniyuki Iwashima [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211109022446.25282-1-kuniyu@amazon.co.jp \
    --to=kuniyu@amazon.co.jp \
    --cc=benh@amazon.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox