From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02BDC43219 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 04:15:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A2661BE1 for ; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 04:15:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242883AbhKRESS (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 23:18:18 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:36160 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242866AbhKRESH (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Nov 2021 23:18:07 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E86D61B97; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 04:15:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1637208907; bh=PTqCpbwq93f2tydjM7GHvVfMh97Dm2j/qCiybeViXBM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JwYmyMUbX0T+fWqb3JQMHsef3x1nG3hkHWkYbK00HVdWuHDonDrywg6Uw+Vl2t8D2 vbvuZifOwbQeZTyv2jIG0/9P7VkMIwpkGmJNe7SBkmu4Eokh4gx/15UUqRiR0lrLfu hnUpw9oR2dU7O9dGKhShkLKAZwSc2QydsSEbXUXScHo46tR1f54auSVHLJ+6xuxto6 wP7Lg9flYmEhdbjoqMRy4DLop+KfpkTWZpIR3t+74OHT9bqlvfV6gJiNSWy5c8ngNk pBlL1759vuguSqzLD2f3fhAnyIDEADrRPcdVXoFDuKx5lezoqYzbP8/gpqAsWssD14 NMHB08HxOYdbg== From: Jakub Kicinski To: davem@davemloft.net Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Kicinski Subject: [PATCH net-next 6/9] net: unexport dev_addr_init() & dev_addr_flush() Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2021 20:14:58 -0800 Message-Id: <20211118041501.3102861-7-kuba@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20211118041501.3102861-1-kuba@kernel.org> References: <20211118041501.3102861-1-kuba@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org There are no module callers in-tree and it's hard to justify why anyone would init or flush addresses of a netdev (note the flush is more of a destructor, it frees netdev->dev_addr). Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski --- net/core/dev_addr_lists.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c b/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c index ae8b1ef00fec..a23a83ac18e5 100644 --- a/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c +++ b/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c @@ -513,7 +513,6 @@ void dev_addr_flush(struct net_device *dev) __hw_addr_flush(&dev->dev_addrs); dev->dev_addr = NULL; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_addr_flush); /** * dev_addr_init - Init device address list @@ -547,7 +546,6 @@ int dev_addr_init(struct net_device *dev) } return err; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_addr_init); void dev_addr_mod(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int offset, const void *addr, size_t len) -- 2.31.1