netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alessandro B Maurici <abmaurici@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: fix possible double lock calling link changed handler
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 01:49:46 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211123014946.1ec2d7ee@work> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YZxrhhm0YdfoJcAu@lunn.ch>

On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 05:18:14 +0100
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:55:48PM -0300, Alessandro B Maurici wrote:
> > From: Alessandro B Maurici <abmaurici@gmail.com>
> > 
> > Releases the phy lock before calling phy_link_change to avoid any worker
> > thread lockup. Some network drivers(eg Microchip's LAN743x), make a call to
> > phy_ethtool_get_link_ksettings inside the link change handler  
> 
> I think we need to take a step back here and answer the question, why
> does it call phy_ethtool_get_link_ksettings in the link change
> handler. I'm not aware of any other MAC driver which does this.
> 
> 	 Andrew

I agree, the use in the lan743x seems related to the PTP, that driver seems
to be the only one using it, at least in the Linus tree. 
I think that driver could be patched as there are other ways to do it,
but my take on the problem itself is that the PHY device interface opens
a way to break the flow and this behavior does not seem to be documented,
so, instead of documenting a possible harmful interface while in the callback,
we should just get rid of the problem itself, and calling a callback without
any locks held seems to be a good alternative.
This is also a non critical performance path and the additional code
would not impact much, of course it makes the stuff less nice to look at.
The patch also has an additional check for the lock, since there is a 
function that is not calling the lock explicitly and has a warn if the lock
is not held at the start, so I put it there to be extra safe.

Alessandro

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-23  4:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-23  2:55 [PATCH] phy: fix possible double lock calling link changed handler Alessandro B Maurici
2021-11-23  4:18 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-11-23  4:49   ` Alessandro B Maurici [this message]
2021-11-23  8:21     ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-11-23 14:11       ` Andrew Lunn
2021-11-23 16:06         ` Alessandro B Maurici
2021-11-23 20:32           ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-11-23 22:31             ` Alessandro B Maurici
2021-11-23 14:09     ` Andrew Lunn
2021-11-23 14:14       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-11-23 15:58       ` Alessandro B Maurici

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211123014946.1ec2d7ee@work \
    --to=abmaurici@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).