From: Alessandro B Maurici <abmaurici@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: fix possible double lock calling link changed handler
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 12:58:11 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211123125811.066d0680@work> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YZz2AJ+wqasknw2p@lunn.ch>
On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 15:09:04 +0100
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote:
> The callback has always had the lock held, so is safe. However,
> recently a few bugs have been reported and fixed for functions like
> phy_ethtool_get_link_ksettings() and phy_ethtool_set_link_ksettings()
> where they have accessed phydev members without the lock and got
> inconsistent values in race condition. These are hard race conditions
> to reproduce, but a deadlock like this is very obvious, easy to fix. I
> would also say that _ethtool_ in the function name is also a good hit
> this is intended to be used for an ethtool callback.
>
> Lets remove the inappropriate use of phy_ethtool_get_link_ksettings()
> here.
>
> Andrew
Yes, I was under the impression because the lan743x driver used that way,
this was an expected use case, and that why the patch, but you are 100%
correct that the phy_dev information sent to the call back would be
unprotected if used with that patch. My mistake.
Alessandro
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-23 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-23 2:55 [PATCH] phy: fix possible double lock calling link changed handler Alessandro B Maurici
2021-11-23 4:18 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-11-23 4:49 ` Alessandro B Maurici
2021-11-23 8:21 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-11-23 14:11 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-11-23 16:06 ` Alessandro B Maurici
2021-11-23 20:32 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-11-23 22:31 ` Alessandro B Maurici
2021-11-23 14:09 ` Andrew Lunn
2021-11-23 14:14 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2021-11-23 15:58 ` Alessandro B Maurici [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211123125811.066d0680@work \
--to=abmaurici@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).