From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CEDC433F5 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 07:17:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232395AbhKYHUX (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Nov 2021 02:20:23 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:35347 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1349230AbhKYHSW (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Nov 2021 02:18:22 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1637824511; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=DrdfoJuoyuNHgO43HGDwB7KWOWfQOVP7BNUczbuAPp8=; b=Csn6QAYanCT42bmVAwdUJmnnmPcCqfb4/x+R8tiF+ct0GfPqtVLv0XtuDxoYxp8rUj21pU poP3aW5oOuPnuuwye9Ozd9ng6z2IeeJQSx35kBfD2gCUf235rYuPzBsC1T0jr6nVdK9dfQ qs2eRx6Wpl95dhyOJcLtQJpf8M98nlU= Received: from mail-ed1-f69.google.com (mail-ed1-f69.google.com [209.85.208.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-310-lmxE98vjOm69MeGU60vicA-1; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 02:15:10 -0500 X-MC-Unique: lmxE98vjOm69MeGU60vicA-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f69.google.com with SMTP id l15-20020a056402124f00b003e57269ab87so4663070edw.6 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:15:09 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=DrdfoJuoyuNHgO43HGDwB7KWOWfQOVP7BNUczbuAPp8=; b=fahx/uAjgitO0j41TBRqly+Vaikyb5YEUuN2EmAUCurPeZGD7ZK79YcqyOAeTQuD4k pPUUQ+8jNiOZhqre/wk5w9cactqXiWsBYJBtxRA9OJCo76iNTWERA1Rx4eddeGI9nOT4 z5PzPiTgApaa64Sr0HwRzoKGZygRJBJ1xl4i1LZCH3H/vKpaFX18OkdZfGNDG3oNJCiH PPIaTOoYCHvV1KmMRx66+bELxJ6MNr6tiV567d5ah/k7MWkYTHd0DCpDHOJj3oL5vMVv 0bwBj42q7BoEBytY2ja1plXaCinb0zzp5mHEEt5vY8w3PPc4D88Ow9LbpT9k85SfPSrO qveg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533FKwBmoGRFgZk4/bhuK9KI+KX5LxH84aY7aVeC1zblboymL0kx KARAzjV2Bj2ORtZ3QfZzJQZN52Y0V59FmAPAR+WRNgZxC+74wzKC2y+6nbXLv36rWGGbVZzVqJN 5PSOUDKAk5aBfJbZH X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3496:: with SMTP id v22mr34843223edc.177.1637824508931; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:15:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzT4Ux6nJrzHTTYycQkkUo3yCguo+1d6EF1/y5nPdIGUEaoov9qqpPkw+eeVpNdKNDvLUtBeA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3496:: with SMTP id v22mr34843190edc.177.1637824508772; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:15:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from redhat.com ([45.15.18.67]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m15sm1281606edl.22.2021.11.24.23.14.52 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 24 Nov 2021 23:14:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 02:14:48 -0500 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Jason Wang Cc: virtualization , netdev , linux-kernel , Eli Cohen Subject: Re: [PATCH net] virtio-net: enable big mode correctly Message-ID: <20211125021308-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20211125060547.11961-1-jasowang@redhat.com> <20211125015532-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 03:11:58PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:00 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 02:05:47PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > When VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature is not negotiated, we assume a very > > > large max_mtu. In this case, using small packet mode is not correct > > > since it may breaks the networking when MTU is grater than > > > ETH_DATA_LEN. > > > > > > To have a quick fix, simply enable the big packet mode when > > > VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is not negotiated. > > > > This will slow down dpdk hosts which disable mergeable buffers > > and send standard MTU sized packets. > > > > > We can do optimization on top. > > > > I don't think it works like this, increasing mtu > > from guest >4k never worked, > > Looking at add_recvbuf_small() it's actually GOOD_PACKET_LEN if I was not wrong. OK, even more so then. > > we can't regress everyone's > > performance with a promise to maybe sometime bring it back. > > So consider it never work before I wonder if we can assume a 1500 as > max_mtu value instead of simply using MAX_MTU? > > Thanks You want to block guests from setting MTU to a value >GOOD_PACKET_LEN? Maybe ... it will prevent sending large packets which did work ... I'd tread carefully here, and I don't think this kind of thing is net material. > > > > > Reported-by: Eli Cohen > > > Cc: Eli Cohen > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang > > > > > > --- > > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 7 ++++--- > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > index 7c43bfc1ce44..83ae3ef5eb11 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > @@ -3200,11 +3200,12 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > > > dev->mtu = mtu; > > > dev->max_mtu = mtu; > > > > > > - /* TODO: size buffers correctly in this case. */ > > > - if (dev->mtu > ETH_DATA_LEN) > > > - vi->big_packets = true; > > > } > > > > > > + /* TODO: size buffers correctly in this case. */ > > > + if (dev->max_mtu > ETH_DATA_LEN) > > > + vi->big_packets = true; > > > + > > > if (vi->any_header_sg) > > > dev->needed_headroom = vi->hdr_len; > > > > > > -- > > > 2.25.1 > >