From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>,
virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] virtio-net: enable big mode correctly
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 02:31:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211125022736-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEuYWoL4x5o_OO2a27X4Ah8Y2ggBjy0XFHe3Onmj4RhFFg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 03:26:22PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:20 PM Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 03:15:33PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 3:09 PM Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 02:05:47PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > > When VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature is not negotiated, we assume a very
> > > > > large max_mtu. In this case, using small packet mode is not correct
> > > > > since it may breaks the networking when MTU is grater than
> > > > > ETH_DATA_LEN.
> > > > >
> > > > > To have a quick fix, simply enable the big packet mode when
> > > > > VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is not negotiated. We can do optimization on top.
> > > > >
> > > > > Reported-by: Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>
> > > > > Cc: Eli Cohen <elic@nvidia.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 7 ++++---
> > > > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > index 7c43bfc1ce44..83ae3ef5eb11 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > > > > @@ -3200,11 +3200,12 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > > > > dev->mtu = mtu;
> > > > > dev->max_mtu = mtu;
> > > > >
> > > > > - /* TODO: size buffers correctly in this case. */
> > > > > - if (dev->mtu > ETH_DATA_LEN)
> > > > > - vi->big_packets = true;
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > + /* TODO: size buffers correctly in this case. */
> > > > > + if (dev->max_mtu > ETH_DATA_LEN)
> > > > > + vi->big_packets = true;
> > > > > +
> > > >
> > > > If VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is provided, then dev->max_mtu is going to equal
> > > > ETH_DATA_LEN (will be set in ether_setup()) so I don't think it will set
> > > > big_packets to true.
> > >
> > > I may miss something, the dev->max_mtu is just assigned to the mtu
> > > value read from the config space in the code block above (inside the
> > > feature check of VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU).
> >
> > Sorry, I meant "If VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is ***NOT*** provided". In that case
> > dev->max_mtu eauals ETH_DATA_LEN so you won't set vi->big_packets to
> > true.
>
> I see but in this case, the above assignment:
>
> /* MTU range: 68 - 65535 */
> dev->min_mtu = MIN_MTU;
> dev->max_mtu = MAX_MTU;
>
> happens after alloc_etherdev_mq() which calls ether_setup(), so we are
> probably fine here.
>
> Thanks
Actually the issue with VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU is that devices might be
tempted to expose 9k here simply because they support jumbo frames,
if they also don't support mergeable buffers this will force big
packet mode.
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > if (vi->any_header_sg)
> > > > > dev->needed_headroom = vi->hdr_len;
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.25.1
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-25 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-25 6:05 [PATCH net] virtio-net: enable big mode correctly Jason Wang
2021-11-25 7:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-25 7:11 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-25 7:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-25 7:20 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-25 7:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-25 7:28 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-25 8:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-11-25 7:09 ` Eli Cohen
2021-11-25 7:15 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-25 7:20 ` Eli Cohen
2021-11-25 7:26 ` Jason Wang
2021-11-25 7:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2021-11-25 7:41 ` Eli Cohen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211125022736-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=elic@nvidia.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).